The Financial Independence Retire Early movement, or FIRE, is a group of people trying to gain financial independence by amassing enough wealth and cutting their expenses so that they can retire extremely early. Many FIRE proponents are looking to retire in their 30s or 40s.
So how do people in the FIRE movement achieve their goal, and what are the drawbacks?
How Financial Independence Retire Early works
The FIRE movement centers on taking control of your finances, and proponents focus less on increasing their earnings than on spending less. FIRE participants focus on two areas, which are really two sides of the same coin:
- Saving and investing more of what you earn.
- Spending less of what you earn.
By saving and investing their money, participants grow an amount of money that can generate enough income to sustain their lifestyles. They use detailed spreadsheets and financial plans to model out how they’ll be able to meet their needs based on their income and the rate of return they can expect from their savings and investments in stocks or stock funds.
To meet their goals, FIRE participants must take on extra risk by investing in stocks, and that means understanding how the stock market works and having a brokerage account. They won’t be able to rely on the low returns and absolute safety of a bank account to amass their fortune.
And by spending less, they reduce the level of savings they need in order to retire early. While some FIRE critics say that FIRE participants live a too-frugal lifestyle to reach their goal, many proponents say that they’re not making extraordinary sacrifices. In fact, they say by spending on what they really love that they actually derive more enjoyment from those things. Plus, they enjoy moving toward independence, when they can do what they truly love.
But however they approach it, FIRE participants see the lifestyle as a way to spend their time doing what they really want to do rather than what society tells them they should want.
Because of their desire to retire early, many participants won’t be able to take full advantage of employer-sponsored retirement plans such as a 401(k). They may or may not be able to take advantage of plans such as an IRA, depending on whether they earn income in retirement. Instead, they’ll need to save in taxable accounts or in accounts such as a Roth IRA, both of which offer access to cash (at least at some level with the IRA) without any penalties.
Support from other FIRE participants
Financial independence is not something that usually drops in your lap, and the FIRE movement works hard to achieve its dream, thinking years out instead of whether they should buy that new car this year. The movement is also really supportive of members who have started the journey, and members provide spreadsheets and other tools to help each other.
This social solidarity helps FIRE participants realize that there is a community that values what they’re trying to achieve, making it that much easier to do.
Different types of FIRE movement
While these savers are all classified in the FIRE movement, there are many different subsets of the movement. They’re all striving for the ultimate goal, but participants have different objectives and approaches, based on what they see as valuable and the sacrifices they’re able to make.
But they can be divided into some key groups based on their approach:
- Extreme savers: While many might see all FIRE participants as extreme savers, there’s a subset that goes even further. They cut down on every frivolity to minimize expenses – no cars, the most modest apartment or even free accommodation, if they can find it. They don’t go out and may even curtail a lot of social interaction unless it’s on their terms. In short, everything is subservient to the goal of financial independence. These savers might target saving 70 or 80 percent of their after-tax income.
- Moderate savers: Moderate savers may still seem extreme for many folks but may still be saving much of their income – think 50 percent or more. However, they’re not willing to give up some things that they do value. They may trade down from two cars for one, for example, and they make it a used car that they run until the wheels fall off. They might take a family vacation to go camping rather than go to an expensive city. These folks may be willing to work an extra year or two in exchange for doing some things they love.
And FIRE participants can also be divided into how they want to spend their independent lifestyle:
- Continue working: For some people, the FIRE lifestyle is just a way to get to a place where they can take the kind of jobs that they really want. One of the biggest myths about the FIRE movement is that people want to stop working. They might use their independent lifestyle to volunteer, work part-time or even start their own business, perhaps helping others achieve the FIRE dream. For this group FIRE is less about dropping out of society than it is about being able to take on projects and work that they’ve dreamed of doing.
- Do whatever they want: For others, the FIRE lifestyle is about total freedom. They may want to travel, but instead of a two-week vacation, they might seek out a place to stay for months at a time. This group might pursue a personal project when it suits them or decide that they want to sleep in for the next six months. They might help out friends and family with their extra time or decide to go back to school.
In both cases, these new retirees – now with financial independence – can do what they really want without worrying about where their money comes from. Not only do they have their emergency funds stocked with cash, they know where next year’s income is coming from, too.
Drawbacks of the FIRE movement
Criticisms of the FIRE movement generally fall into one of two key categories:
- Some critics say that savers are making extreme trade-offs to achieve their goal of early retirement. While that may be true, proponents of the lifestyle rightly argue that it’s their own choice to make. Certainly the FIRE lifestyle is not for everyone, but those who find it valuable are making a choice that’s right for them. And many defend their lifestyle by saying that it actually makes them happier to reduce their spending and to aim for financial independence.
- Other critics point out that FIRE participants may be taking on too much risk by retiring early, using assumptions about their finances that are unsustainable. And this criticism carries more weight, but of course it depends on the individual’s financial situation and planning.
Some early retirees, for example, may assume that they could generate the kind of returns that investors saw in stocks in 2019, when the S&P 500 rose a whopping 29 percent. That’s well above the market’s long-term average of about 10 percent annually. Or perhaps some may rely on their ability to pick stocks and have had a few lucky years.
Critics also say that FIRE participants are not factoring in the longer-term costs of major expenses such as health care and housing, which have continued to increase substantially. Plus, leaving the workforce may create an employment gap that many employers will view negatively. For sure, staying out of the workforce will ding the amount of Social Security income you can draw later in life, and that’s when those on a fixed income may most need the money.
These are all relevant concerns, but many in the FIRE community say they have considered these scenarios and have planned accordingly. They may cite their financial models as proof that they have been realistic, pointing to detailed projections of their income and expenses.
In any case, a major decline in stocks, which typically occurs as part of a recession, will stress-test these plans and forecasts, and may challenge the security of many early retirees.
The FIRE movement has attracted a lot of attention in recent years – some of it negative. Yet it’s hard to see how people consciously spending their money and time on what they truly love is anything but a net positive, even if it does have some costs along the way.