|
Dodging those ATM
fees
By Libby
Wells • Bankrate.com
ATM surcharges are rising and
reaching into more pockets than ever and, according to consumer
advocates, providing hefty profits for banks.
That irksome fee you pay every
time you use some other bank's automated teller machine is not only
going up in price, it is becoming more widespread, according to
Bankrate.com's semiannual checking account survey.
But as ATM charges rain down harder than ever,
there are umbrellas to keep you out of the worst of it.
Banks
charging ahead
An analysis of 353 banks in America's 35 largest cities found
78.4 percent of banks charging fees to use ATMs, compared with 70
percent just a year ago. The average fee has gone from $1.33 to
$1.38 in a year. But 41.4 percent of banks assess $1.50.
Based on figures from the General Accounting
Office, Bankrate.com estimates that banks are collecting $1.9 billion
from consumers every year.
"These charges continue to be a hotly debated
issue," the study says, "with consumers and advocacy groups on one
side, and banking institutions on the other."
When you think ATM card, you also could be
thinking debit card.
For the first time since it began analyzing
checking account costs in 1997, Bankrate.com included debit cards.
Debit cards look like a credit card and are used primarily for point-of-sale
transactions.
"A staggering percentage of institutions offering
debit cards and ATM cards charge the same fees," the study says.
Of the 310 institutions offering debit cards, 295 had the same price
structure for debit and ATM cards, the survey found.
Fighting
the fees
S ome California communities have drafted
laws banning surcharges.
The Santa Monica City Council passed an ordinance
Oct. 12 that will prohibit them effective Nov. 11, Berkeley and
Los Angeles are considering similar bans and San Francisco voters
are expected to abolish ATM surcharges when they vote Nov. 2 on
Proposition F.
"Surcharges have caused outrage around the
country," says Adam Radinsky, deputy city attorney and head of Santa
Monica's consumer protection unit. "We're just the first city to
do anything about it."
In addition, state banking commissioners in
Iowa and Connecticut have banned surcharges.
Paying
twice at the ATM
The reason the fee is so despised is because in most instances,
a consumer pays twice. Wherever there is a surcharge from that other
bank, there is usually a "foreign" or "off-us" fee charged by your
own institution.
Bankrate.com's survey found a drop in the number
of banks that don't charge the foreign fee. Only 11.3 percent of
banks surveyed this year did not impose the fee, compared with 12.8
percent last year. Of banks that do, the most common amount is $1.50.
Unlike the surcharge, which you are notified
of at the other guy's ATM, you get no heads-up on a foreign fee
from your own bank. You just need to know your bank's policy.
Part of the off-us fee goes to reimburse the
ATM owner, which means that bank is getting paid twice -- both times
by the consumer.
Your bank is also getting a "double dip" because
the other bank is giving it something for your business.
"The lion's share stays with your bank, but
everybody gets a cut," says Radinsky.
Everybody but the consumer. You get a $20 ATM
withdrawal from another bank and it costs you $3.
Profit
or cost?
Banks say the surcharge helps them cover the cost of buying, installing
and maintaining ATMs.
Advocates say it's all about profits, and the
losers are consumers and smaller financial institutions.
Santa Monica, says Radinsky, is an example.
Two banks -- Wells Fargo and Bank of America -- control 60 percent
of the 100 ATMs in Santa Monica, he says. People avoid surcharges
by taking their business to the big banks with larger ATM networks.
"The surcharge inherently favors larger players,"
says Radinsky. "People leave the small banks."
Laura Polacheck, senior analyst in the division
of legislation of public policy for AARP,
agrees. "The surcharge is just an incentive to switch to that other
bank that has the ATM," she says.
"The theory that banks do this to discourage
giving business to other banks makes no sense. ... They are gouging
people for pure profit."
Ways
around the charges
Besides moving to Iowa, there are a few other things you can do
to avoid surcharges:
- Stick to your own bank's ATM network.
- Switch to a bank with a larger ATM network
if you do most of your banking that way.
- Ask for cash back when you use your ATM
card at the grocery store; there is generally no charge for this.
- To minimize ATM trips, make fewer, larger
withdrawals.
- Use a teller, but be sure you won't be charged
a fee for doing so.
Bankrate.com's survey found that 92 percent
of banks do not charge customers to use their own teller machines,
but there are other fees sometimes associated with ATM cards which
consumers need to be aware of. They include:
- Point-of-sale charges -- About 80
percent of banks do not charge their customers to use their debit
cards for purchases, according to Bankrate.com , but other
customers should watch out for fees of $.15 to $1.50 per transaction.
- Annual fee -- Only 10 percent of
institutions surveyed this year charge customers for the privilege
of using their card, but that is double the number from last year.
The most common fee is $12.
- Card replacement fee -- The cost
to replace a lost or stolen card continues to be borne by 51.3
percent of banks studied, but that is a 2.7 percent drop from
last year. The most common fee is $5.
- International
fees -- The majority of banks
charge customers to use their cards abroad. The survey found the
most common fee to be $1.50, but there are banks charging up to
$5 per foreign transaction.
-- Posted: Oct. 20, 1999
|