Bankrate follows a strict editorial policy, so you can trust that we’re putting your interests first. Our award-winning editors and reporters create honest and accurate content to help you make the right financial decisions.
Key Principles
We value your trust. Our mission is to provide readers with accurate and unbiased information, and we have editorial standards in place to ensure that happens. Our editors and reporters thoroughly fact-check editorial content to ensure the information you’re reading is accurate. We maintain a firewall between our advertisers and our editorial team. Our editorial team does not receive direct compensation from our advertisers.
Editorial Independence
Bankrate’s editorial team writes on behalf of YOU – the reader. Our goal is to give you the best advice to help you make smart personal finance decisions. We follow strict guidelines to ensure that our editorial content is not influenced by advertisers. Our editorial team receives no direct compensation from advertisers, and our content is thoroughly fact-checked to ensure accuracy. So, whether you’re reading an article or a review, you can trust that you’re getting credible and dependable information.
You have money questions. Bankrate has answers. Our experts have been helping you master your money for over four decades. We continually strive to provide consumers with the expert advice and tools needed to succeed throughout life’s financial journey.
Bankrate follows a strict editorial policy, so you can trust that our content is honest and accurate. Our award-winning editors and reporters create honest and accurate content to help you make the right financial decisions. The content created by our editorial staff is objective, factual, and not influenced by our advertisers.
We’re transparent about how we are able to bring quality content, competitive rates, and useful tools to you by explaining how we make money.
Bankrate.com is an independent, advertising-supported publisher and comparison service. We are compensated in exchange for placement of sponsored products and, services, or by you clicking on certain links posted on our site. Therefore, this compensation may impact how, where and in what order products appear within listing categories. Other factors, such as our own proprietary website rules and whether a product is offered in your area or at your self-selected credit score range can also impact how and where products appear on this site. While we strive to provide a wide range offers, Bankrate does not include information about every financial or credit product or service.
Sarah Toevs, director of the Center for Aging at Boise State University, calls the baby-boomer bulge “Humpty-Dumpty,” after the egg-shaped population bulge all those births caused. She sees Humpty as a retirement-planning problem of major proportions.
For at least a millennium, the population has been distributed with a large base of young people at the bottom capped by a small cluster of adults at the top. But that is changing rapidly because over the next 19 years, 10,000 people will turn 65 every day. “This will make it difficult to enjoy life as we know it,” Toevs says.
When Social Security and later Medicare were conceived, there were five working people for every recipient of these retirement programs. But that number has diminished and will continue to shrink. “In 15 years, there will be just 1.5 people working to support Humpty,” says Toevs. “We’re living longer, and we haven’t adjusted the system.”
How would she fix it?
- Provide incentives — probably tax incentives — for people who don’t need their Social Security to delay taking it — preferably forever.
- Enact legislation that would encourage people to keep working until they are at least 70 or 72 — and employers to keep them on the job.
- Give younger people more access to preventive health care, so they stay healthier longer.
- Encourage end-of-life planning, so more people embrace the idea of dying gracefully. According to the National Institutes of Health, about 30 percent of all Medicare dollars are spent caring for people during their last year of life.
- Spend more money on services that keep older people living in their homes and connected to the community — nursing homes are costly.
“We have to figure out how to shore up the supports, or life will be very, very different in the next 15 to 25 years,” Toevs says.
Share