- advertisement -

Payday lenders use banks to escape usury laws

Banks swim with payday lender Imagine going to your bank for a loan and being told the annual percentage rate (APR) would be 400 percent.

If you're thinking that sounds more like one of those payday loan places than a bank, you're right. But the crackdown on payday-loan facilities for violating state usury laws has led some of them to team up with banks in an attempt to get around the law.

State and national officials are focusing now on the national banks and, increasingly, federally chartered state banks that are abetting these schemes.

It's similar to the way credit cards from out-of-state banks are able to charge higher interest rates than your state allows. Federal law allows national banks to "export" their interest rates, along with their product, to other states.

Swimming around state laws
The way it works is payday lenders affiliate with a national bank and use the bank's charter to get around usury laws and other consumer protection laws to charge exorbitantly high interest rates on payday loans.

- advertisement -

Payday loans are cash advances on a person's next paycheck -- typically short-term, high-interest loans of no more than $500. A consumer writes a postdated, personal check for the amount of money to be borrowed, plus fees, and the check is held until the next payday -- usually, two weeks.

The borrower then either pays the loan with cash or the check is deposited, or the loan is rolled over if the customer can't come up with the money.

Essentially, the payday lender can claim it's the bank making the loan. However, although the loan's paperwork may have the bank's name on it, the payday lender is the one advancing and collecting the money.

Eagle National Bank of Upper Darby, Pa., has been ordered to stop its payday lending activities. The Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), which supervises national banks, says payday lending is Eagle's cash cow, its "most significant lending product in terms of revenue."

Eagle teamed with payday lender Dollar Financial Group and let Dollar run the show, according to the OCC.

"Eagle had effectively turned over the management of the bank's main business to a third party, and then virtually ignored how that business was being conducted," says John Hawke, comptroller of the currency.

The OCC says borrowers were charged $15 to $20 for every $100 borrowed for a two-week period. The loans were carried on Eagle's books as assets but the bank kept just $4 from each $100 borrowed. Dollar provided the origination, servicing and collection of the payday loans.

According to OCC figures, Eagle's annual payday-loan volume increased from $3 million in 1995 to about $400 million by 2001.

Eagle didn't return our calls, but Rick Lyke of Financial Service Centers of America, an organization representing the check-cashing industry, says these actions may dissuade some banks from partnering with payday lenders. But, he adds, critics haven't come up with an alternative solution.

"This is a product that just about everybody acknowledges there's a need for. Some people have a difficult time managing short-term cash emergencies. But consumer groups are really anti-business groups. They've criticized the product for a number of years but they offer no alternative to consumers who need the service."

North Carolina attorney general Roy Cooper is suing payday lender Ace Cash Express, saying its relationship with Goleta National Bank is simply to get around the law.

Payday loans without the bite
But Cooper agrees with Lyke that there is a need for these services -- just not under typical payday lender terms.

"I strongly believe consumers should have the opportunity for small emergency loans on fair terms. I believe there is a place for these loans, but the problem with the terms of payday lenders who have hooked up with interstate banks is these loans are unfair to consumers.

"Ace is charging $17 per $100 borrowed for a two-week loan. They're claiming this can help a consumer in an emergency, but a loan like that is like asking for a life boat and being thrown an anvil. Consumers can quickly get on a debt treadmill."

That debt treadmill begins when the consumer can't repay the initial loan by the next payday. The borrower rolls over the loan, plus additional fees -- and gets deeper into debt.

Some states limit how many times a loan can be rolled over, but payday lenders get around that by having the customer write a new check to start a new loan.

Jean Ann Fox of the Consumer Federation of America says payday loans aren't short-term loans, they're long-term debt burdens that are designed to be unpayable.

"These aren't people who are living paycheck to paycheck; these are people who aren't making it to the next payday. They have no savings for the emergencies we all know we'll have to face."

A study by the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions found that the typical payday lender customer in Wisconsin is female, age 39 and takes home $18,675 annually.

Fox says her organization knows of four, typically small, national banks and a handful of federally chartered state banks that are assisting payday lenders.

"Big banks don't want to do this. It's embarrassing for a bank to be encouraging other bank account holders to write checks that aren't covered by money. This makes banks uncomfortable," says Fox.

Shark repellent
Fox says she hopes the FDIC cracks down on state banks to make sure that rent-a-bank practices don't shift to them because of the legal actions against national banks.

The best way for consumers to avoid paying sky-high interest for a short-term loan is to build a savings nest egg. Asking an employer for an advance on a paycheck could be another alternative.

Fox also agrees that many people who are experiencing a cash crunch need short-term loans. She'd like to see a more affordable, less risky scenario with a maximum interest rate of 36 percent and a $5 administrative fee.

"That recognizes that even with small loans there's a cost to providing the loan. No loans of more than $300 and a term of two weeks to pay back every $50 borrowed. That way the payback is spread over more paydays."

In addition, Fox says there should be a mandatory break between loans so loans aren't rolled over. She also wants a single fee of $15 if the check bounces.

"Don't allow lenders to treat the check as if it's a bad check. The lender knows you don't have the money in the bank. He shouldn't be allowed to go to court and say, 'This person committed fraud, it's a bad check,'" says Fox.

Cooper says he's open to negotiation on how loans could be structured.

"There are a number of good ideas on how small short-term loans to consumers could be structured on fair terms. But, clearly, the old payday law and the anarchy we have now are unacceptable."

-- Posted: Feb. 4, 2002

top of page
See Also
Payday loans an expensive choice
How to avoid payday loan sharks
Colleges give brush-off to payday loan sharks
More banking stories


Checking and Savings
Compare today's rates
Interest checking 0.34%
MMA 0.39%
$10K MMA 0.35%

  How long will your savings last  
  How to reach a savings goal -- with scheduled payments  
  Watch your savings grow with regular deposits  
Checking Basics
Manage your account in a fee-friendly way.
What's the best checking
account for me?
ABCs of ATMs
What are all these fees?
Is online banking secure?

Banking glossary  
News archive  
Keep an eye on the leading rates  
Find a high-yielding CD

- advertisement -
- advertisement -