Credit Cards Blog

Finance Blogs » Credit Cards » Benefits to be more protected

Benefits to be more protected

By Marcie Geffner · Bankrate.com
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Posted: 9 am ET

Recipients of certain federal government benefits should soon get some additional protection from creditors who want to seize the direct-deposited funds for repayment of debt.

Federal law already prohibits creditors from taking government benefits out of checking accounts to satisfy unpaid debts. However, creditors have used court orders to freeze the accounts so that the beneficiaries are unable to use the funds. When the beneficiary is overwhelmed by the paperwork to unfreeze the account, the bank hands over the supposedly off-limits funds to the creditor, causing significant hardship to the beneficiary.

The new rule will establish procedures that financial institutions must follow when they receive a garnishment order against an account holder who receives certain types of federal benefit payments by direct deposit, according to a summary published Feb. 23 in the Federal Register.

Financial institutions will need to identify which accounts contain protected benefits, figure out how much was deposited during a two-month "look-back" period and ensure that the account holder has access to at least that much or the current account balance, whichever is less. The rule also contains notification requirements and a liability safe harbor for financial institutions.

The rule should help seniors, military veterans, people with disabilities and others who receive federal benefits by direct deposit, according to the National Consumer Law Center in Washington, D.C.

"The new rule prohibits the practice of denying beneficiaries access to these essential funds in bank accounts," the organization said in a statement.

The final rule is open for public comment until May 24; however, an interim final rule will take effect May 1. The rule is being issued by five agencies: The U.S. Treasury, Social Security Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, Railroad Retirement Board and Office of Personnel Management.

Follow me on Twitter: @marciegeff

«
»
Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
1 Comment
Beth
April 21, 2011 at 2:19 am

Social security and other government benefits have always been protected from garnishment by both federal and state law. This further protects these funds once they have been deposited into the recipient's account. It's a shame that the government needs to go to these lengths to protect that which was already protected from creditors that break these laws.