Retirement Blog

Finance Blogs » Retirement » The case for pooling savings

The case for pooling savings

By Jennie L. Phipps · Bankrate.com
Tuesday, January 21, 2014
Posted: 2 pm ET

One of the key differences between 401(k) plans and old-fashioned defined benefit pensions is that you don't get the advantage that comes with sharing risk among a large pool of other retirees.

The American Academy of Actuaries offers this illustration in its new report, "Retirement for the Ages":

Two 65-year-old retirees know that they will live an average of 20 years. What they don't know is which one will live an additional 15 years and which one will live for 25 years. If each has saved $300,000 in his retirement savings accounts, actuaries will calculate that both can withdraw $1,746 a month. One of them will die after 25 years, when he hits 90, with no money left. The other will die in 15 years at age 80, leaving $165,000 to his heirs. The calculation assumes annual returns of 5 percent.

If the two retirees choose to pool their money, then both could increase monthly withdrawals to $2,008, or $262 more a month, but neither would be able to leave anything for heirs. Old-fashioned pensions work this way, but the longevity risk is pooled over a much larger number of retirees. That's why people who get old-fashioned pensions after working a lot of years are entitled to such generous monthly checks.

Given this mathematical reality, the actuaries suggest that the problem of longevity-driven shortfalls in retirement savings could be partially resolved if the government would change laws affecting 401(k)s to encourage the establishment of regional or national plans that would enroll people without access to defined benefit plans or even well constructed 401(k) plans. Their money would be pooled and that would give them more retirement-planning security.

Lacking that, the actuaries suggest that people plan to self-manage their savings in the early years of retiring, but buy a deferred annuity -- also known as a longevity annuity -- at age 65, payable at age 85. This will ensure that they will have enough money if they reach a very old age.

The actuaries point out that creating a government plan to make sure that people have enough money to last throughout their life spans isn't just a humanitarian mandate. People of all ages have a vested interest in creating a secure system of retirement for everyone. "If individuals run out of money, future generations -- successive generations of taxpayers -- will be called upon to address the shortfall through public programs or some other systemic effort to forestall retirees' financial distress. An efficient retirement income system will minimize the potential that future taxpayers will bear the burden of supporting today's taxpayers in retirement," the actuaries conclude.

«
»
Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
6 Comments
Johnd864
May 02, 2014 at 7:50 pm

I feel like Im regularly seeking interesting features you just read about a number of subjects, but I handle to add in the blog among our translates every day when you gagckgededeg

Johne751
May 02, 2014 at 7:49 pm

Good post. I study something more challenging on completely different blogs everyday. It is going to all the time be stimulating to learn content material from different writers and practice somewhat one thing from their store. I dakddakbgadc

Johnd986
April 30, 2014 at 2:19 am

While think this kind of Real estate property industry hope against hope turn back in the positive course? Or maybe can it be at a standstill very young to tell? We're glimpse many terracing property foreclosures modish edbeeefaeeed

caryl griscavage
January 22, 2014 at 2:04 pm

Government plans do not work. Why should I share my hard earned money with someone who did not. More and more people will not save because they know someone else will and why should they?! Leave the government out of my money - I earned it and if someone else does not save then the family should take care of them. Not the government which by the way is all of us taxpayers who are working hard and being responsible. The government then wants the responsible to take care of the irresponsible. How does this breed self reliance? Oh what is that now???? Nothing we have in this country anymore.

Carol in Boston
January 22, 2014 at 1:28 pm

One more entitlement program in disguise....so let's review...one person works hard, saves money and when they retire they can give a good portion of that hard-earned cash to someone who did not save, did not properly prepare for their own retirement and is happy to have someone else support them....and - to top it off - no heirs get to inherit...sounds like another hair-brained Socialist idea....I've got an idea - hey Mr. President, all you CEO's who support this administration, all you big bankers, Mr. Soros, Mr. Gates, Mr. Buffett - YOU FIRST. And when you run out of YOUR money... we can pick someone else's pockets! What a joke!

Dave in Illinois
January 22, 2014 at 12:40 pm

Ya! Trust our government with more of our money. Just review problems with Social Security. I believe the best approach is to just start saving early, save as much as you can, and use no load index funds (choose funds with lower fees). Don't play the market ups and downs (adhere to dollar cost averaging philosophy). Just stay the course. The returns may not be the greatest, but compounding over thirty years works.

Add a comment

(Comments may take 5-10 minutes to appear)