Retirement Blog

Finance Blogs » Retirement Blog » Military cuts retiree COLAs

Military cuts retiree COLAs

By Jennie L. Phipps ·
Friday, January 17, 2014
Posted: 10 am ET

This week's congressional budget deal included a provision to reduce cost-of-living adjustments by 1 percent for military retirees younger than 62, starting in 2016. Disabled veterans will be exempt from the cut. The Military Officers Association of America, or MOAA, estimated that the typical soldier who retires after 20 years at age 40 will lose $83,000 over 20 years. The typical retired officer will get $124,000 less over 20 years. In all, the cuts are expected to save the government $6 billion over the next decade.

The military is outraged over these cuts to promised retirement plans and several groups, including MOAA and the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the VFW, have vowed to seek repeal.

In the meantime, J. Scott Spiker, CEO of First Command Financial Services, financial planners specializing in helping members and veterans of the military manage their money, says, "Military people understand that the sanctity of their retirement benefits have been violated. The government has stepped into prospective retiree benefits and said, 'We're willing to tinker.' These benefits have been inviolate for a long time and people are very worried."

Spiker says only about one-sixth of the people who initially enlist in the military stay for the minimum 20 years and earn retirement benefits. After 20 years of service, a retiree gets 50 percent of his final base pay for life, plus cost of living or COLA adjustments. If he stays 30 years, he gets 75 percent of his base pay for life plus the COLA.

Spiker says that in today's competitive military, making the 20-year mark isn't easy and certainly isn't a given. In previous years, an experienced noncommissioned officer could expect automatic promotions, he says. Today, "If you have a single blemish on your service record, they are going to say you aren’t eligible to re-enlist or ask you to resign.

"In areas where there is a surplus of personnel, they make random cuts and they do it to people at a stage where there are no retirement benefits. If you are at the 14-, 15-, 16-year point, they may say to you, 'We'll give you retirement, but it will be a fraction of what you would have gotten if you had made it to 20.'"

For anybody choosing a military career today, Spiker says what all this boils down to is the need to start retirement planning early. He tells his clients to put three things in place the moment they enlist. What  he has to say is good advice for non-military workers as well because if military retirements can be trimmed, can Social Security be far behind? Spiker says:

  • Have a contingency plan for what sort of alternative career you would pursue if your military service ended abruptly.
  • Open a military thrift savings account and fund it regularly. Thrift accounts are like 401(k)s. There are both regular and Roth versions, but there is no government match. Members of the military who don't qualify for military retirement must build their nest eggs without help.
  • Watch your spending. The military provides benefits beyond salary that can reduce the amount of cash its members need to live. When these benefits disappear, it can be a shock, so members of the military need to be prepared for that eventuality.

Spiker thinks that a further overhaul of the military retirement system is likely -- one that will take into account today's structure. "I think we are going to get to a point where the military is going to have to put incentives in place to get people to overlook uncertainty," Spiker says.

Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
December 30, 2014 at 1:31 pm

Bring back the draft and let McCain's daughter fight. He is quick on the trigger, let's see how "quick on the trigger"he is then! Then cut her retirement pay.

December 28, 2014 at 5:16 pm

During the Viet-Nam War more than 2 million served in-country, but only some 300,000 Americans were WIA & a bit over half of them required some hospitalization, 153,000+. 23,214 of our WIAs were determined to be 100% permanently disabled due to their wounds. Should those two categories, time servers, 95% of whom were never shot at & WIAs be treated the same?

Fat-cat politicians who've never served should cut their own perks & benefits before touching the benefits of anyone in uniform.

CDR Frail( ret)
December 23, 2014 at 6:13 pm

The cuts should first take place in presedential, Senate and Congressional retirements. This is called leadership by example. As a justification for such a radical idea tell them they didn't get shot at for a living.

December 15, 2014 at 11:01 pm

This is the way Republicans work. First they cut taxes so low that we no longer have the money coming in to pay for the things that need to be paid for. "The Bush Tax cuts" Then they say we can no longer afford this and we have to stop the spending and the Fox News people say, Yea, that's right. We can no longer afford this. So these things get cut. Well if they hadn't of cut the taxes to begin with then we could pay for these things. This is how they also plan to cut then get rid of SS and Medicare.