Credit Cards Blog

Finance Blogs » Credit Cards » Credit and financial reform

Credit and financial reform

By Leslie McFadden ·
Monday, June 7, 2010
Posted: 1 pm ET

This week Congress will begin working to reconcile the differences between financial reform bills passed by the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate. President Barack Obama has asked Congress for the final version by July 4.

As currently written, the Senate legislation has more provisions in it that could affect credit card use and access to credit scores. Here are some of the credit-related differences between the bills.

House version:

  • Would establish an independent Consumer Financial Protection Agency, which could write and enforce rules that apply to certain financial products such as credit cards.

Senate version:

  • Would create a consumer protection bureau within the Federal Reserve. Its rules could be vetoed by a council of bank regulators.
  • Would limit the interchange fees banks and payment processors can charge for debit card transactions. Retailers would be able to offer discounts for using payment methods that cost less in interchange fees, and could set minimum purchase amounts for using plastic. These changes could make credit cards more expensive to use at the register than other forms of payment.
  • Would require that consumers receive a free credit score whenever a lender or insurance company took an adverse action against them. "If you get turned down for credit, or receive a higher interest rate on a loan or unfavorable terms on a credit card, you will automatically receive a copy of your score, free of charge," says Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., who introduced the amendment. The adverse action letter would include the credit score actually used by the company to make the decision.

In some cases, people could even see credit scores they can't purchase as consumers, such as "industry-option" versions (tweaked to measure credit risk for specific loan products such as auto loans or bank credit cards), according to John Ulzheimer, president of consumer education at Currently, the Fair Credit Reporting Act gives you the right to a free credit report if a lender or insurer makes an adverse decision against you, but not a credit score.

What do you think of the free credit score provision in the Senate bill? Would you prefer access to a free credit score once a year, like federal law does with credit reports, or free access triggered by an adverse action?

Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
June 08, 2010 at 9:25 am

Washington Mutual Credit Cards accounts used to have everyday access to your credit score showing automatically on line as soon as you logged in, unfortunatelly Chase bought them when they went down the drain and they removed the feature right away.

I believe Credit Cards issuers should provide such data to all account holders at no extra charge. They periodically check and buy everyone's score so why not passing that benefit to the customers if they make enough money out of everyone

Kevin Rutledge
June 07, 2010 at 5:40 pm

We cannot continue to watch this mess these too-big-to-fail banks have made. The Wall Street reform that passed in the Senate is great, but I believe we need a stronger bill to ensure justice. Fight Wall Street and BREAK UP THE BIG BANKS by checking out this page Public Citizen set up to tell your members of congress to continue the fight and strengthen the Wall Street Reform