Bankrate.com

auto

Oops ... did my lender mess up?

Dear Terry,
Last year I took out an auto loan of $32,900.49 with APR of 4.99 percent for 60 months. My credit union calculated my monthly payment (also written on the contract) to be $465.11 and gave me 60 payment coupons to be accompanied with the check each month. But I just realized that this monthly payment amount is substantially smaller than what I should have been paying -- $620.72 per month, according to Bankrate's auto loan calculator. Does this mean that my legal obligation is to only pay the amount based on the coupons or $32,900.49 + 4.99 percent?
-- Alan

Dear Alan,
Even financial institutions make mistakes, though this one seems to be a whopper, since your total payments of $465.11 for 60 months will equal only $27,906.60, far short of the $37,243.20 for a loan of $32,900.49 for 60 months at 4.99 percent. The calculated payment amount of $465.11 would have been for a loan of $24,652.49 over the same 60 months at the same 4.99 percent. Considering that the 49 cents appears in both loan amounts, it strikes me as perhaps more than a coincidence. Are you sure you didn't trade in a car on this deal and get the difference of $8,248 knocked off?

Assuming it wasn't a trade or a combination of trade and rebates, I'd say you have two choices: Point out the error to the credit union and see what you can work out, or consult a lawyer about whether you can be held liable for the shortfall once the loan is paid off.

I'd recommend consulting a lawyer first so you know where you stand before contacting the credit union.

This week
'New' Chrysler may mean more competitive pricing
Does saving gas really save me money?
How can I rescue my fugitive car?
Did my lender make an $8,200 mistake?
advertisement

Compare Auto Rates
zip code:
product:



advertisement
 

A little research could save you BIG on interest.

Don't have time? Our rate-tracker tool saves you time and money. Delivered Thursdays.
 
advertisement
Bankrate on Facebook
Partner Center
advertisement
There is more than meets the eye in the recent small claims court case where a former attorney was awarded a nearly $10,000 judgme