| One,
two or three checking accounts for couples? | | By
Jenny C. McCune Bankrate.com |
|
Togetherness makes for a happy relationship, but it
shouldn't necessarily extend to your checking account. While some
couples can merge their monies in a single joint account, others
find ways to manage finances separately, yet interdependently.
Many financial advisers suggest that while a couple
may want a joint account for joint household expenses, such as home mortgage,
utility bills, lawn maintenance and so on, each spouse should keep his or her
own account. Perils of a single joint
account
Beware of potential problems with a joint account. With such an
arrangement, it's easy to make mistakes, particularly in this age
of Check
21. The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act reduces the
time it takes for a check to clear by largely eliminating the "float"
or grace period between when you write a check and when it gets
cashed. So having a joint account with two check writers almost
guarantees bounced checks.
"Checks
clear so fast today, that if you're both paying bills separately, you won't know
your balance and it's a matter of when, not if, checks will bounce," says
Pamela Thompson, a CPA in San Dimas, Calif. In addition, couples
often have different ways of handling money, and co-managing a joint checking
account can become a "stress point," Thompson says. She
has firsthand knowledge of how different financial styles can affect a couple.
Even before she married her husband, another CPA, it became apparent that they
had different ways of keeping a checkbook. Thompson was less detail- and more
big-picture oriented than her husband. For example, Thompson's husband didn't
like how she would roughly estimate her account balance on the fly rather than
take the time to balance it exactly every time she opened the checkbook. Spouses
who differ on how to record transactions with a joint account can drive each other
nuts. "Since my husband did not like the way I handled my checkbook before
we got married, we decided that he could be in charge of our joint checking account,"
Thompson says. Indeed, designating one person to be in charge of a joint account
is one way to eliminate many of the problems that crop up with shared finances.
Even though sharing a joint account can be fraught
with peril, Thompson advocates the one-joint-account-per-married-couple
form of bookkeeping and bill paying. She says it can work, but it
requires a lot of work from both spouses. "Bottom line: If
you want to have one checkbook, you must have a system for each
spouse to know what checks the other one will be writing, and both
spouses need to be involved in the finances," Thompson says.
Separate
but equal
Mitch Freedman, a CPA in Sherman Oaks, Calif., points out that separate
accounts are advantageous for people living in community-property
states such as California. Separate accounts will keep your finances
separate. A joint account signals to the divorce court that the
money contained in such an account is "community property,"
which means the monies will be divided evenly, regardless of how
much each party contributed. Freedman says that having separate
accounts may become important as a potential asset-protection device.
Actual financial arrangements can supersede what's
spelled out in a prenuptial agreement. For example, the prenuptial
agreement may designate each person's earnings as separate property,
but if a couple shares a joint account in a community-property state,
the court may decide that the account is community property and
won't abide by the prenuptial agreement, Freedman says.
|