Retirement Blog

Finance Blogs » Retirement Blog » Rethinking how 401(k)s invest

Rethinking how 401(k)s invest

By Jennie L. Phipps ·
Thursday, June 6, 2013
Posted: 8 pm ET

One of the big differences between defined benefit plans, or old-fashioned pension plans, and defined contribution plans, such as 401(k)s and other contributory retirement plans, is the way the money is invested.

Defined benefit plans are tightly managed by pension professionals with long-term growth and safety in mind. Defined contribution plans have traditionally focused on maximizing returns, according to Robert Capone, executive vice president, BNY Mellon Retirement Group. He also points out that they are managed by a committee, with plan administrators offering fund choices, employers picking a range of options and employees choosing among them. Capone, who authored a report that examines the investments typically included in this process, concludes that as a result, defined contribution plans ignore options that could improve return and reduce risk.

"In order to really improve rates of return with lower risk and with true diversification, you have to think out of the box," Capone says, and that can be difficult within such a stratified system.

Capone found that most defined contribution plans invest more than 50 percent of their assets in U.S. equities, while the average defined benefit plan allocates less than 35 percent to U.S. equities and they have a broader mix overall of investment types. Capone experimented with modifying the typical DC plan allocation to make it more like a defined benefit allocation by moving 20 percent of the money to emerging markets, real estate and hedge funds.

He applied this revised allocation strategy to 20 years of defined contribution history and determined that compared to the typical return of a 401(k) during that time period, this investment plan would have produced 0.5 percentage point greater returns and it would have performed better during periods of time when the economy cooled.

Capone concludes the report by writing, "For us, the math is clear: Incorporating these nontraditional strategies reduced risk, provided a hedge against inflation and managed volatility while improving diversification and performance through noncorrelated assets."

Capone says popular retirement planning target date funds easily could, but don't, offer this mix of investment options, and he doubts that they will anytime soon, largely because people view emerging markets, real estate and hedge funds as too risky. "I think it is going to take a lot of education to get people to buy into the fact that we need to change the investment paradigm," he says.

Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
Johnson Hamdan
May 11, 2014 at 9:52 pm

Great website, I love it

June 07, 2013 at 1:17 pm

Investing early, steadily, and at low cost are important, but so is diversification. Most growth funds invest in large tech/industrial companies, bond funds invest in Treasuries, and international funds invest in developed countries. I want to round out the core funds with REITS, natural resource, health, and emerging markets. Options need to include more of these specialized funds to provide more diversification, growth, and less risk for those that are more knowledgeable of market conditions.

Bob H.
June 07, 2013 at 11:27 am

Good points, Paul. The costs of actively-managed funds just aren't justifiable given all the facts.

Paul McGee
June 07, 2013 at 9:32 am

There are two issues here:

1. The past 20 years has seen an unprecedented long-term capital appreciation of bonds, as interest rates have fallen steadily from the mid-teens in 1978 to nearly zero today. Does anyone think that will ever happen again?

2. The majority of actively-managed funds underperform the market averages every single year. So, professionally managed pension funds are guaranteed to underperform. This is not something that anyone wants to emulate in their 401(k).

The key to success in a 401(k) is to invest early, invest steadily, invest in equities, and choose the lowest cost investment options available (index funds). Study that.