|
States act against
bank policies that create extra bounced checks
By Lucy
Lazarony Bankrate.com
New York stood strong against banks'
"biggest-first" check-cashing policy that can stick consumers with
extra bounced-check fees.
The state's banking
department adopted a regulation
in August 1999 that requires financial institutions to spell out
to their customers the order in which checks will be cleared.
The order makes a difference: If a bank uses
the big-to-small processing method, clearing the biggest check first,
it can be quite costly.
Say you write four checks on one day. Your bank
will clear the biggest check first, even if you wrote it last. If
it bounces, every subsequent check bounces, too -- and you get socked
with four bounced check fees instead of one. With fees as high as
$30 a pop, you can be paying some serious cash for that budgeting
faux pas.
"This has been something of a deep, dark secret,"
says Jean Ann Fox, director of consumer protection for the Consumer
Federation of America.
"The only reason I'm aware of for banks to
choose high-to-low processing is to bring in more revenue."
Processing
order boosts revenue
Federal law allows banks to process checks in any order they
choose.
"If there's 9,000 banks out there, you're going
to have 9,000 slightly different policies," says a spokeswoman for
the American Bankers Association.
But New York's policy says that the check-processing
policy must be disclosed when an account is opened and again if
a bank's policy should change. All current checking account customers
in New York must be informed of their financial institution's check
processing policies by Dec. 24.
"This way, things don't take place without (customers)
knowing," says a spokesman in the State of New York Banking Department.
California
calls it 'bad faith'
At least two other states have laws to discourage banks from using
big-to-small processing to maximize bounced-check fees, according
to Philip Gaddy, an attorney in Albuquerque, N.M. Gaddy filed a lawsuit
against First Security Bank, accusing it of using the policy to boost
bounced-check fees.
California has identified this practice as an
example of "bad faith" on the part of the banks, Gaddy says. Nevada
law prohibits banks from using big-to-small processing to boost
bounced-check fees. It stipulates that when multiple checks are
drawn on a single business day, and there is not enough money in
the account to pay all the checks, the checks must be cleared in
the order of ascending amounts.
But banks point out that lots of people prefer
to have their larger checks, such as mortgage and car payments,
clear before, say, their Sears bill. Some folks even prefer to pay
their larger checks first.
According to the American Bankers Association,
most consumers write their important checks first, so if checks
are processed in numerical order they're going to come out high-to-low,
anyway.
Ask
about your bank's policy
Curious about your bank's check processing policy? Ask.
"We would encourage consumers to ask the question
of the bank," says the American Bankers Association representative.
"In many cases, checks get processed immediately. So it's really
important to keep a running total in your account."
To avoid getting close to the edge where the
order will make a difference, keep track of every withdrawal from
an automated teller machine, every debit card purchase and every
check that has been written. It's also a good idea to stagger larger
payments so they don't all hit the bank at once, and pay the big
bills right after payday when the account is flush with cash.
-- Updated: Jan. 31, 2002
|