Mortgages Blog

Finance Blogs » Mortgages Blog » Libor: Winners and losers

Libor: Winners and losers

By Polyana da Costa ·
Monday, July 16, 2012
Posted: 2 pm ET

Were mortgage borrowers winners or losers in the Libor scandal?

As shocking as it may sound, it's possible that some borrowers benefited from banks lying. It's a weird but valid theory.

In case you haven't heard, some of the world's largest banks are under investigation for allegedly trying to manipulate the Libor rate from 2005 through 2009. Barclays has admitted wrongdoing and said it's not alone in the rate-fixing scheme.

If banks were successful in manipulating the Libor, it is possible that  borrowers with adjustable-rate mortgages, or ARMs, paid too much or too little in interest, depending on when their loans reset.

About 2 million ARM loans were tied to the Libor rate as of March, according to Guhan Venkatu, an economist with the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, based on data provided by Lender Processing Services, or LPS. In 2008, most subprime ARMs and about 60 percent of prime ARMs were tied to the Libor.

"I suspect that it was random as to whether people with loans tied to the Libor were helped or hurt," says Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, in Washington, D.C.

It appears that, initially, lenders tried to push the Libor up. During the financial crisis, they wanted to push rates down.

Was your loan affected?

If you don't know whether your ARM loan was tied to the Libor, you can look at your mortgage note or other loan documents. If the note says your rate was based on an index, keep reading and look for the word Libor or London Interbank Offered Rate.

Hint for winners

If your loan reset during the financial crisis, it's possible that your loan had an artificially low rate.

"During the crisis (the banks) systematically understated their Libor in order to convince investors that they were not as stressed as they actually were," Baker says. "This would have benefited borrowers."

Why would banks lie to give you a lower rate?

They wouldn't. Lenders didn't go through all that trouble to give you break on your loan. They simply had bigger assets at stake and bigger problems to deal with at the time. The gains or losses mortgage borrowers incurred during this mess was simply collateral damage of a much bigger operation.

"The purpose of the manipulation was not to make more money on mortgages," Baker says. "They were trying to win on their bets on derivatives. They didn't care about the impact on mortgages."

Some experts say it is unlikely that banks were successful in manipulating the rate, unless several of them conspired to push the rate in the same direction. I explained why in a previous blog.

But the more I think about this, the more I doubt lenders would go through the trouble of cheating if they didn't think the game would work.

I'm not alone.

From a Bloomberg story:

"It is far easier to manipulate Libor than it may appear," says Andrew Verstein, a lecturer at Yale Law School, in a paper to be published in the winter 2013 issue of the Yale Journal on Regulation. "No conspiracy is required."

Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
August 01, 2012 at 7:36 pm

The banks intised the borrowers to take on an ajustable arm loan at the lower rates. They told buyers they could wait a couple years then refi. What they were doing, was double dipping commissions. They put these people in the positions so they would have no choice but to go back to the same lender and get another loan to refi. No banks wants another banks problem. They new this is what would have to the borrowers. About 15 years ago, I personally had a bad experience with a dishonest realtor and mortgage broker on a balloon document that was snuck into my paperwork without my knowledge and it cost me big time. Nobody would touch my file with a 10 foot pole and I ended up signing a "DEED-IN-LUE". I spoke to the owner of the builder who build my house who was in kahoots with them and told him I would take them all to court and sue them if they did not fix this. Anyway, in time things got fixed and it never showed up on my credit report. I will never trust banks (specially brokers) again and I always double and triple check and ask alot of questions now and get it in writing.