Retirement Blog

Finance Blogs » Retirement Blog » Future of Medicare

Future of Medicare

By Jennie L. Phipps ·
Sunday, April 22, 2012
Posted: 6 am ET

I was at the Association  of Health Care Journalists in Atlanta last week. Friday morning, three Medicare experts talked about its future and the almost inevitable rise in costs to its recipients -- something that will affect everyone's retirement planning.

Tricia Neuman, senior vice president and director of the Program on Medicare Policy at the Kaiser Family Foundation, offered these numbers that put the impact of any increase in perspective:

  • Most Medicare recipients live on less than $85,000 a year. More than 50 percent have incomes less than $25,000 a year.
  • Medicare recipients aren't living on their enormous retirement savings accounts either. Only 5 percent have more than $1 million salted away. About 50 percent have less than $50,000 in their retirement savings.

There are occasionally calls for  making up any shortfall by charging the wealthy more. It sounds good, but the reality is only 5 percent of Medicare recipients have incomes of $85,000 or more. And those recipients are already paying a premium.

Part B Medicare fees are free for people who earn below the poverty level -- about $12,000 for an individual. Otherwise, the fees are $99 a month for those with incomes under $85,000.  Above that, the fees are graduated with singles who earn more than $214,000 or couples making greater than $428,000 paying the top rate -- $319.70 per month.

Robert Moffit, a fellow at the Center for Policy Innovation for the conservative Heritage  Foundation, called for changing the Medicare payment system to one based on vouchers. Each recipient would receive a flat amount that could be used to buy private insurance. He said such a change would do three things:

  • Guarantee seniors access to a wide variety of plan options and benefits.
  • Reduce costly micromanagement that undercuts efficiency.
  • Slow the growth of Medicare spending through competition.

At the other end of the philosophical spectrum, Henry Aaron, senior fellow at Brookings Institution, pooh-poohed the notion that a voucher system was a good idea, in part because 25 percent of Medicare recipients have cognitive disabilities, like Alzheimer's, and aren't able to make smart decisions about insurance purchases.

He also pointed out the impact of health care reform on Medicare. The Affordable Care Act calls for making Medicare more efficient. "I believe system reform holds out tremendous hope, and a positive outcome from the legal challenge to The Affordable Care Act is absolutely critical for the outcome of Medicare," Moffit said.

In an earlier conference session, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter was asked his opinion of The Affordable Care Act and the possibility that it will be overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court.

"I don't know," said the 87-year-old Carter. "I'm not in charge anymore. But I would say there's a lot of propaganda going on. Republicans and certain talk shows have misled the American people about it.

"I preferred a single pay plan, or 'Medicare for all.' It would have been much simpler, and it was promised previously by President Obama. He bowed under pressure, which I understand. But it didn't happen. And I'm not confident that the Supreme Court will make the right decision on the health law. If they strike it down, we'll have to start over, and more people in this country will end up suffering," he said.

Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
John Q Taxpayer
April 23, 2012 at 12:53 pm

Bald Eagle, you are an idiot. Of course healthcare competition leads to lower costs. Look at Lasik. Most insurance plans don't cover it because it is considered cosmetic, and the prices have done down in the last 5 years. Jennie should be ashamed that you agree with her, your inability to spell or have a sentence that doesn't use quotes makes you both look stupid. Then again, maybe it is your Communist point of view that does that.

Bald Eagle
April 22, 2012 at 4:19 pm

The U.S. healthcare system does not need more free-market competition, as suggested by the Heritage Foundation. More healthcare competition means more expensive surgeries, more expensive tests, more expensive CT scanners and MRIs and more expensive medications and drugs. Healthcare competition does NOT lower cost. Also, insurance companies (because they are for-profit companies) add 18% to 31% administrative overhead rates on top of the cost of paying for medical care in the U.S. (compared to a 3% overhead rate for Medicare). Jimmy Carter is correct--the U.S. needs a single-payor Medicare system for everyone. The current "competitive" insurance-driven system just isn't working (and hasn't worked for a long time). And we don't need a "competitive" "free-market" system for healthcare anymore. It just drives the cost up.

Bald Eagle
April 22, 2012 at 4:05 pm

vouchers=a way for the Republican party to destroy Medicare