Bankrate follows a strict editorial policy, so you can trust that we’re putting your interests first. Our award-winning editors and reporters create honest and accurate content to help you make the right financial decisions.
Key Principles
We value your trust. Our mission is to provide readers with accurate and unbiased information, and we have editorial standards in place to ensure that happens. Our editors and reporters thoroughly fact-check editorial content to ensure the information you’re reading is accurate. We maintain a firewall between our advertisers and our editorial team. Our editorial team does not receive direct compensation from our advertisers.
Editorial Independence
Bankrate’s editorial team writes on behalf of YOU – the reader. Our goal is to give you the best advice to help you make smart personal finance decisions. We follow strict guidelines to ensure that our editorial content is not influenced by advertisers. Our editorial team receives no direct compensation from advertisers, and our content is thoroughly fact-checked to ensure accuracy. So, whether you’re reading an article or a review, you can trust that you’re getting credible and dependable information.
You have money questions. Bankrate has answers. Our experts have been helping you master your money for over four decades. We continually strive to provide consumers with the expert advice and tools needed to succeed throughout life’s financial journey.
Bankrate follows a strict editorial policy, so you can trust that our content is honest and accurate. Our award-winning editors and reporters create honest and accurate content to help you make the right financial decisions. The content created by our editorial staff is objective, factual, and not influenced by our advertisers.
We’re transparent about how we are able to bring quality content, competitive rates, and useful tools to you by explaining how we make money.
Bankrate.com is an independent, advertising-supported publisher and comparison service. We are compensated in exchange for placement of sponsored products and, services, or by you clicking on certain links posted on our site. Therefore, this compensation may impact how, where and in what order products appear within listing categories. Other factors, such as our own proprietary website rules and whether a product is offered in your area or at your self-selected credit score range can also impact how and where products appear on this site. While we strive to provide a wide range offers, Bankrate does not include information about every financial or credit product or service.
Editor’s note: This is a transcript of the audio file.
Should you apply for Social Security benefits at age 62? I’m Barbara Whelehan with the Bankrate.com Personal Finance Minute.
The decision on when to begin drawing Social Security benefits is a personal one. If your health is compromised or you lost your job, it may be necessary to begin drawing benefits at your earliest opportunity, which generally is age 62. But if you’re healthy and you enjoy working, it behooves you to consider delaying benefits.
According to the Social Security Administration, if you live to the average life expectancy, your lifetime benefits will be about the same no matter when you begin receiving benefits. So naturally, if you start early, the amount you get will be reduced because you’ll be drawing benefits longer than if you wait.
For example, let’s say you’re entitled to $1,000 at age 66 when you reach full retirement age. At age 62, your benefit amount would be $750. If you wait to age 70, your benefit amount would be $1,320.
Your decision depends on a number of factors, such as whether longevity runs in your family and how much money you have saved up for retirement. After all, Social Security isn’t intended to replace the income you make in your working years. It’s supposed to prevent you from falling into poverty.
For more information about Social Security and retirement, visit Bankrate.com. I’m Barbara Whelehan.
Share