WHAT IS
SAFE AND SOUND?
Capital is an essential measurement of an institution's financial resilience. It acts as a bulwark against losses and as protection for depositors when a bank is experiencing economic instability. When looking at safety and soundness, the higher the capital, the better.
First National Bank of Scotia received a score of 6 out of a possible 30 points on our test to measure capital adequacy, failing to reach the national average of 13.13.
A bank's Tier 1 capital ratio is a widely used measure of this buffer. First National Bank of Scotia's Tier 1 capital ratio was 9.99 percent, above the 6 percent level regulators consider adequate, but lower than the national average of 25.65 percent. A higher capital ratio suggests the bank will be better able to weather financial downturns.
Overall, First National Bank of Scotia held equity amounting to 7.74 percent of its assets, which was lower than the national average of 12.03 percent.
Bankrate uses this test to determine the effect of problem assets, such as unpaid mortgages, on the bank's capitalization and allocated loan loss reserves.
A bank with lots of these kinds of assets could eventually be required to use capital to cover losses, cutting down on its buffer of equity. Many of those assets are also likely to be in non-accrual status and no longer earning interest for the bank, pushing down earnings and elevating the risk of a future failure.
On Bankrate's test of asset quality, First National Bank of Scotia scored 40 out of a possible 40 points, better than the national average of 37.49 points.
A handy indicator of asset quality is the percentage of problem assets a bank holds compared to its total assets. As of December 31, 2017, 0.27 percent of First National Bank of Scotia's loans were noncurrent, meaning they were more than 90 days past due or were in non-accrual status. That's below the national average of 1.01 percent.
Banks maintain a reserve to deal with troubled assets known as an "allowance for loan and lease losses." Comparing the size of that reserve to the total amount of problem loans can be a widely used indicator when evaluating a bank's ability to manage troubled assets. Unfortunately, the FDIC did not provide information on First National Bank of Scotia's loan loss allowance in its most recent filings.
How profitable a bank is has an effect on its safety and soundness. A bank can retain its earnings, boosting its capital buffer, or put them to work addressing problematic loans, likely making the bank more resilient in tough times. However, banks that are losing money are less able to do those things.
First National Bank of Scotia scored 14 out of a possible 30 on Bankrate's earnings test, falling short of the national average of 15.12.
Return on equity, calculated by dividing net income (profit, basically) by the total amount of equity, is one key measure of a bank's earnings. The most recent annualized quarterly return on equity for First National Bank of Scotia was 6.23 percent, below the national average of 8.10 percent.
The bank reported net income of $2.2 million on total equity of $35.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017. The bank had an annualized return on average assets, or ROA, of 0.47 percent, below the 1 percent deemed satisfactory in accordance with industry standards and below the average for U.S. banks of 1.00 percent.
Bankrate.com's Safe & Sound Ratings provide a star rating system to evaluate the current financial status of financial institutions. The information gathered about banks, credit unions and thrifts is updated as set forth in the Terms of Use of Safe & Sound Ratings and Reports. The Safe & Sound Ratings information is grouped by categories of banks, thrifts and credit unions.
Bankrate.com evaluates the financial condition of institutions and assigns a one- to five-star rating for each with five stars representing the highest rating. Institutions with satisfactory performance will generally receive a rating of three or more stars. The majority of institutions fall into the three- to four-star range. An institution with an "NR" rating may be too new to rate or may have limited the publicly available information in their regulatory filings. The "NR" is not an indication of financial strength or weakness. The Safe & Sound rating is believed to be reliable, but the information is not guaranteed. In addition, events since the information was collected may have altered the institution's financial condition.