WHAT IS
SAFE AND SOUND?
Capital works as a cushion against losses and affords protection for depositors during periods of economic trouble for the bank. It follows then that a bank's level of capital is a valuable measurement of an institution's financial fortitude. When looking at safety and soundness, more capital is better.
Bank of Iberia scored below the national average of 13.13 on our test to measure the adequacy of a bank's capital, achieving a score of 8 out of a possible 30 points.
One way to measure this buffer is looking at a bank's Tier 1 capital ratio. Bank of Iberia's Tier 1 capital ratio was 14.54 percent, higher than the 6 percent level regulators consider adequate, but lower than the national average of 25.65 percent. The higher the capital ratio, the better the bank will be able to stand up to financial challenges.
Overall, Bank of Iberia held equity amounting to 8.27 percent of its assets, which was lower than the national average of 12.03 percent.
This test is intended to estimate how the bank's loan loss reserves and overall capitalization could be affected by troubled assets, such as past-due loans.
Having a large number of these types of assets suggests a bank may eventually have to use capital to absorb losses, reducing its equity buffer. It also means that there are likely to be many assets that are in non-accrual status and thus aren't earning money, reducing earnings and increasing the chances of a failure in the future.
On Bankrate's test of asset quality, Bank of Iberia scored 28 out of a possible 40 points, failing to reach the national average of 37.49 points.
The percentage of problem assets a bank holds compared to its total assets is a helpful indicator of asset quality.As of December 31, 2017, 2.61 percent of Bank of Iberia's loans were noncurrent -- in other words, they were more than 90 days past due or were in non-accrual status. That's above the national average of 1.01 percent.
Banks maintain a reserve to handle problem assets known as an "allowance for loan and lease losses." That reserve's size can be a widely used indicator when evaluating a bank's ability to manage troubled assets, especially when compared to the total amount of problem loans. Unfortunately, the FDIC did not provide information on Bank of Iberia's loan loss allowance in its most recent filings.
How profitable a bank is has an effect on its safety and soundness. Earnings may be retained by the bank, expanding its capital cushion, or be used to address problematic loans, potentially making the bank better able to withstand economic trouble. Banks that are losing money, however, are less able to do those things.
On Bankrate's earnings test, Bank of Iberia scored 4 out of a possible 30, falling short of the national average of 15.12.
One key measure of a bank's earnings is return on equity, calculated by dividing net income (profit, basically) by the total amount of equity. Bank of Iberia's most recent annualized quarterly return on equity was 1.61 percent, below the national average of 8.10 percent.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, the bank earned net income of $78,000 on total equity of $4.8 million. The bank had an annualized return on average assets, or ROA, of 0.13 percent, below the 1 percent deemed satisfactory in accordance with industry standards and below the average for U.S. banks of 1.00 percent.
Bankrate.com's Safe & Sound Ratings provide a star rating system to evaluate the current financial status of financial institutions. The information gathered about banks, credit unions and thrifts is updated as set forth in the Terms of Use of Safe & Sound Ratings and Reports. The Safe & Sound Ratings information is grouped by categories of banks, thrifts and credit unions.
Bankrate.com evaluates the financial condition of institutions and assigns a one- to five-star rating for each with five stars representing the highest rating. Institutions with satisfactory performance will generally receive a rating of three or more stars. The majority of institutions fall into the three- to four-star range. An institution with an "NR" rating may be too new to rate or may have limited the publicly available information in their regulatory filings. The "NR" is not an indication of financial strength or weakness. The Safe & Sound rating is believed to be reliable, but the information is not guaranteed. In addition, events since the information was collected may have altered the institution's financial condition.