Taxes Blog

Finance Blogs » Taxes Blog » Who should be taxed?

Who should be taxed?

By Kay Bell ·
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Posted: 12 pm ET

A recent New York Times/CBS News telephone poll on the deficit and taxes indicates that when it comes to dealing with the federal deficit, America's feelings are as mixed -- and as politically partisan -- as those of folks on Capitol Hill who will have to make the country's ultimate fiscal decisions. 

In general, though, we appear to agree with the philosophy of the late U.S. Senator Russell Long of Louisiana: "Don't tax him. Don't tax me. Tax that man behind the tree!"

That is, we want the deficit to be cut, but we aren't so keen on being the ones who personally have to do anything taxwise to accomplish that.

Take, for example, the question on whether American companies pay "their fair share" in federal income taxes. Most poll respondents (56 percent) said companies pay less than their share.

Still, those surveyed said that if they had to choose between raising corporate taxes or cutting government spending in order to reduce the deficit, they'd rather cut spending.

This answer indicates to me that too many folks don't realize that some of that cutting is going to affect programs and services they like or depend upon, but that's for another blog post. For now, back to the poll.

When asked whether they would prefer raising individual taxes on households making $250,000 or more or increasing corporate tax rates, the businesses lose.

A further query into corporate tax attitudes showed that most poll respondents believe all companies should pay about the same income tax rate.

But among the third of those who thought tax rate accommodations should be made by the type of business, most thought "small businesses" should be given a lower tax rate.

That's it, just the general category of small businesses, which leads me to believe, true to Mr. Long's "leave me alone" belief, that these respondents operated or worked for small companies.

The gregarious Louisiana lawmaker uttered his famous "tax the other guy" quip to make a point. But I think lately, it's lost on too many of us.

There is no nameless, faceless guy behind a tree who can bear the burden of getting America's fiscal house in order.

We all have to take a hit. But it needs to be, as the poll phrased it, a fair share contribution from each of us, both when it comes to program cuts and tax increases.

Make sure you don't miss out on any tax news and tips. Subscribe to Bankrate's free Weekly Tax Tip newsletter.

You also can follow me on Twitter at @taxtweet.

Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
May 04, 2011 at 7:36 am

If corporations get taxed more to run their businesses in the US, along with the added burden of the Healthcare "Reform", they have no problem, moving right out of the country. They will take the jobs and move to India, China Mexico. Where, not only the taxes are mitigated, but so are healthcare costs and "large salaries" (people in those countries are willing to work for pennies on the dollar compared to Americans).

Part of the issue, IS spending. Not just on the programs people rely on, but also on a LOT of fluff. Just bc the government pulls in more revenue (taxes), does not solve the issue. Have we ever heard the saying "The more you make, the more you spend"? Simply raising taxes, without requiring significant spending cuts and lowering some benefits, doesn't solve anything and does not force the government to keep their spending in line. If I have to manage my household on a budget and cut out Starbucks when things get too tight, why shouldn't our government be required to do the same.

Notice I say government, bc as much as they want to claim innocence, the Republicans have their fair share of poor spending. EVERYONE needs to tighten their belts!! I'm fiscally conservative, but I know the party I vote for are no angels. There are a lot of people gaming the system, that needs to be monitored better, people are going to have to retire later and save for themselves and healthcare is going to be a disaster (I have to go to the doctor and pay a co-pay just to be able to buy Tylenol with my Flexible Spending does this lower medical expenses?)