Taxes Blog

Finance Blogs » Taxes Blog » Added tax relief for Sandy victims?

Added tax relief for Sandy victims?

By Kay Bell ·
Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Posted: 3 pm ET

While most of the country is watching the "fiscal cliff," members of Congress who represent areas hard hit by Superstorm Sandy are fighting to revise federal disaster relief for their constituents.

The Senate began debate Monday of a supplemental disaster assistance bill for fiscal year 2013.

That measure includes several tax relief components in connection with the federally designated Sandy disaster area.

As outlined by its cosponsors Sens. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and Robert Menendez, D-N.J., the legislation would, in part, allow:

  • Affected residents to claim full itemized deduction of expenses paid or incurred as a result of disaster cleanup.
  • Taxpayers who do not itemize to increase their standard deduction by the amount of disaster losses not covered by insurance.
  • Donors to give more than the 50 percent of adjusted gross income limit in qualified disaster contributions.
  • Storm victims to withdraw up to $100,000 in retirement account money to make repairs without facing the 10 percent early distribution or borrow more from their retirement accounts without immediate tax consequences.

While Schumer's and Menendez's colleagues are sympathetic to the troubles facing Sandy victims, some Senators are not fully behind the bill.

The bill includes more than $60 billion in emergency aid, and some fiscally conservative lawmakers believe that the measure is overloaded with projects that are not defined specifically enough.

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., well-known on Capitol Hill for his scrutiny of spending measures, has said that more than half the money would not be spent before 2015. "This is a stimulus bill, not an emergency bill," Coburn told CNN, adding that $20 billion to $22 billion probably is enough money to meet the immediate needs of Sandy victims.

There also is concern that this bill, like emergency aid measures approved in the past, does not have spending offsets to make up the budget difference in the proposed new expenditures.

While pro-Sandy-relief senators are fighting for their measure, a similar measure is pending in the House. Given that that chamber also has so many conservative members, passage there also could be problematic.

You can bet, however, that if the bill doesn't clear either the House or Senate in this lame duck session, lawmakers representing folks still trying to repair their Sandy-stricken properties will reintroduce their bills when the 113th Congress convenes in January 2013.

Want the latest news on taxes, tax reform prospects, filing deadlines, Internal Revenue Service alerts and tax-saving tips? Subscribe to Bankrate's free Weekly Tax Tip newsletter.

You also can follow me on Twitter @taxtweet.

Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
1 Comment
Frank Mahnich
December 20, 2012 at 11:05 am

I just read your Tax commentary. You obviously do not understand the tax system. 1st, you stated that the Government will "Lose" over $465b in taxes due to mortgage deductions. The "Government does not "Lose: money because it has no money! The people have money. I repeat: The government has no money, only the peole have money and the government can onlt take, no loose!It is issues like this that people need to understand. And with regard to the tax on investment earnings, do YOU not understand that the investment dollars had alresdy been taxed??? So now you say thaT THESE TAX RATES ARE UNFAIR?? WHen the "rich" in this country pay ovr 86% of the income tax and the USA collects more tax revenue than any country in the world and THEN spends a Trillion more than it collects, people like you need to wake up and see what the real issues are. They are SPENDING ISSUES, not revenue! My GOD, I cannot believe someone like you works in the finance business and cannot understand basic economics. OBAMAs fixation on the rich is obsurd. I am sure you recognize that the increases on the rich will pay for only 8 days of spending. Why don't you critisize his tax policies; why don't you demand huge cuts in spending and demand a leaner government. In the last 4 years, Obama has hired 106 new fed employees a DAY!why??? tHATS OVER $3.1b A YEAR IN NEW GOV COSTS! hOW ABOUT fREEZING ALL BUDGETS AT THE 2011 LEVEL; ELIMINATING AUTOMATIC BUDGET INCREASEs; NOT FILLING JOBs opened BY ATTRITION; CONSOLIDATING AGENCIES, simplifying the tax code (flat tax) making ALL people pay taxes??
Do something constructive instead of cowtowing to the Obama line!