Saving Money Blog

Finance Blogs » Saving Money Blog » Paycheck Fairness Act dies

Paycheck Fairness Act dies

By Rose Raymond ·
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Posted: 10 am ET

Senate Republicans Tuesday blocked a vote on President Barack Obama's Paycheck Fairness Act. The legislation would have updated and strengthened 1963's Equal Pay Act, which outlawed the practice of paying women and men differently for performing the same job.

"It is incredibly disappointing that in this make-or-break moment for the middle class, Senate Republicans put partisan politics ahead of American women and their families," Obama said in a statement released by the White House.

Republicans balk at regulation

President Barack Obama

Senate Republicans said the act would lead to unnecessary lawsuits and regulation, according to Politico.

Politico quoted Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev., who said: "The question is: Will the Paycheck Fairness Act actually address workplace inequality? The simple answer is no. Unfortunately, the only winners under this legislation would be trial lawyers, giving them a windfall, exposing employers to unlimited punitive damages."

Among other things, the Paycheck Fairness Act would have changed the requirements of class action lawsuits and protected employees who disclosed their salaries from employer retaliation, according to the White House.

Wage gap more of a problem today?

The latest Census data reveal that American women currently earn 77 cents for every dollar that men earn for equal work. The wage gap is arguably a bigger problem today than it was in 1963, when more households were headed by male breadwinners.

Today, women comprise nearly half of the workforce, according to Forbes, and a recent Huffington Post article addresses the rise of female-headed households. The article cites a 2010 study that showed women younger than 30 outearned their male peers in most urban areas, and it quoted Liza Mundy, author of "The Richer Sex: How the New Majority of Female Breadwinners Is Transforming Sex, Love and Family," who wrote in a recent article for Time:

Assuming present trends continue, by the next generation, more families will be supported by women than by men ... In 2009, the most recent year for which U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics figures are available, nearly 4 in 10 working wives outearned their husbands -- an increase of more than 50 percent from 20 years before.

This means more households than ever are feeling a greater financial impact from unequal pay practices, and equal pay for equal work may be necessary in the future for Americans to maintain their current standard of living.

Follow me on Twitter @rosehelen.

Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
June 06, 2012 at 11:20 pm

Rins, thank you so much for posting this. I, too, and a professional woman and I am sick to death of otherwise intelligent people quoting the absurd statistic you counter.

If a woman wants to take time off for a family, it's her right. But she has no right to then claim she deserves the same pay as a man - or woman - who continued working full-time while she played mother. We all have choices in this world, and even those with sub-par IQs understand there are consequences to those choices.

Shame on Bankrate for presenting such a ridiculously biased article as news. And Bravo to Congress for doing the right thing.

Rose Raymond
June 06, 2012 at 9:01 pm

Hi Rins, thank you for reading and for the comment. You make some good points.
The 77 cents figure can be found in this blog post:
And when broken down by occupation, a report from the Institute for Women's Policy Research shows wage gaps in the same professions, though they vary depending on the profession.
You can download the report from this page. Thanks again.

June 06, 2012 at 2:49 pm

"The latest Census data reveal that American women currently earn 77 cents for every dollar that men earn for equal work."

That's wrong. When adjusted for controllable factors it's supposedly closer to 95 cents. The BLS counts "full time" as 35 hours or more per week so a woman working 40 hours may make less than a guy working 50 and that's supposed to count as a "gap". Not to mention the BLS isn't comparing an equal number of women in job X to the same number of men in job X. 1000 social workers will make less than 1000 computer programmers. Women are more likely to be social workers and men are more likely to be programmers. So that data would show women earning less than men, but it's not because there is a huge bias. (note: I'm female and sick of people misrepresenting what the gap really is)