Retirement Blog

Finance Blogs » Retirement Blog » Would you privatize Social Security?

Would you privatize Social Security?

By Jennie L. Phipps ·
Sunday, November 27, 2011
Posted: 6 am ET

Former Speaker of the House and current Presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich created a storm last week when he suggested that young people should be allowed to bypass traditional Social Security in favor of private investment retirement accounts.

Under Gingrich's plan, the employer share of Social Security would go to pay benefits for current employees, but younger workers would be able to invest their share of payroll taxes in stocks and bonds.

Gingrich says the plan would let people control their own retirement planning investments, while guaranteeing a minimum level of benefits. Participation would be voluntary.

“If you are dumb enough that you prefer to get less money with less control while relying on politicians, that’s your prerogative,’’ Gingrich says. “You’re an American. You’re allowed to be dumb.’’

Gingrich says his plan would cover Social Security's pending shortfall by turning over to the states a total of 185 public programs, including Medicaid, Section 8 public housing and Pell Grants that pay for college tuition.

On his website, Gingrich calls Social Security, "one of the few unqualified success stories of the Federal government." He says it has been "looted and must be protected."

What do you think? Are you in favor of dismantling Social Security as we know it now in favor of private investment accounts? Have you done better with the money you invest in your 401(k) than Uncle Sam does with Treasury bonds?

Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
November 29, 2011 at 8:09 pm

I would rather control my own destiny than rely on a government that has already proven to be irresponsible with my tax dollars. I am all for privitizing Social In-Security.

November 29, 2011 at 8:20 am

Anybody who says that they trust the government more than the market, obviously isn't doing all the research they need to be doing in what they are investing.

You lost me with that comment.


Will you still trust them if they took away your Social Security TODAY?