Retirement Blog

Finance Blogs » Retirement » Social Security love fest

Social Security love fest

By Jennie L. Phipps · Bankrate.com
Wednesday, June 11, 2014
Posted: 3 pm ET

Proposals to expand Social Security got more congressional support this week from Democrats who are apparently nervous about the mid-term 2014 elections, since some prognosticators predict that Republicans are likely to win enough seats to give them a winning majority in the U.S. Senate.

As the saying goes, the best defense is a good offense. So that could explain why Sens. Patty Murray, D-Wash., and Mark Begich, D-Alaska, yesterday announced a Social Security reform measure that expands the program, flying in the face of proposals from Republicans to reform Social Security by shrinking it.

The proposal from Murray and Begich is called the Retirement and Income Security Enhancements Act, or RAISE. Beginning in 2015, the RAISE Act would do four things:

Levy a 2 percent payroll tax rate on earnings over $400,000. The bill would also give these high earners Social Security credits for paying these taxes, which would raise their Social Security payments, although it is unclear by how much. Nancy Altman, co-director of Social Security Works, says, "There has been a principle from the beginning that the more you contribute, the higher your benefit. It sounds like they are keeping that principle."

tax-blog-proposed-fica-tax-increase

Improve benefits for divorced people. Currently, a divorced spouse is only entitled to receive benefits under the former spouse's earnings if the couple were married for 10 years. Beginning in 2016, this proposal would phase in eligibility for those married from five to 10 years. For example, those married nine years would get 90 percent of benefits. The same formula would apply to survivors benefits for divorced spouses.

Enhance survivor benefits when both spouses are eligible for workers benefits. This alternative benefit calculation would equal 75 percent of the sum of the survivor's own worker benefit plus the Primary Insurance Amount, or PIA, of the deceased spouse. It would be paid only if it were greater than what the current calculation would pay. This benefit would be available to surviving spouses on the rolls at the beginning of 2016 and those becoming eligible after 2016.

Extend benefits for young adults. Under current law, children of retired, disabled or deceased workers are no longer eligible for benefits after age 18, or 19 if they are still in high school. Beginning in 2016, this provision would extend benefits to full-time students until age 23.

Altman thinks that even though this proposal doesn't resolve Social Security's shortfall -- it only keeps the program solvent through 2034, an extra year -- it could win support across the aisle. "Expanding Social Security is both good policy given the squeeze on middle-class families, and it is also good politics because Tea Party members support Social Security the same way that union members support Social Security. Issues like abortion and gun control polarize the nation, but polls show that 70 or 80 percent of people support Social Security, and it is more important than ever."

«
»
Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
337 Comments
JUAN
July 24, 2014 at 11:43 am

What all this means is if we work hard and plan the future, teaching ours kids and the rest of the community how to build their own business, pay theyself first, focusing in make xtra money, the social security wont be any issue at the retirement age.

jake
June 29, 2014 at 7:33 am

mtfast they the libs who control this site will not post your 1st amendment rights.your taking the hits for the sins of your ansestors...you are the minority,an your singing to the choir

jake
June 29, 2014 at 7:29 am

that president after bush,allowed 8 terrorist attacks to go unanswered,and ben laden slip out of his hands..wise up girl

WifeNMother
June 19, 2014 at 3:55 pm

Expanding SS for children ages 18-23 of disabled parents, who enroll in higher education, is wonderful, it will help our teen to afford college, instead of being in the poor house for an education. I say "GOOD JOB " .

STEVEN cARTER
June 19, 2014 at 7:28 am

Social security would be in fine shape if they took it all incomes. Unfortunately rich people make laws and no social security tax is NOT taken OUT OF ANYINCOME OVER 117.000, tAKE SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE TAX OVER ALL INCOMES AND EVERYONE WILL BE IN NICE SHAPE, NO PROBLEMS

ohyeaisthatright
June 16, 2014 at 8:46 pm

MYTFAST-Way to stick it to the man, show your coworkers those comments you posted on that blog, lol

MYTFAST
June 14, 2014 at 11:33 pm

If you don't want to post peoples' not politically correct comments, then don't ask for them. I'm done with this Blog & will show my coworkers the comments I made that you failed to print.

Add a comment

(Comments may take 5-10 minutes to appear)