Retirement Blog

Finance Blogs » Retirement » Sleepless nights and 401(k) matches

Sleepless nights and 401(k) matches

By Jennie L. Phipps · Bankrate.com
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Posted: 3 pm ET

Retirement planning isn't getting any easier.

During the economic crisis two years ago, many companies suspended their 401(k) matches. Last year and in the first half of this year, about 75 percent of firms restored matches but about 25 percent didn't. Of those that renewed the practice, 69 percent brought back the match at a lower level, according to a study by human resource consultant Towers Watson.

This is particularly troubling when it is increasingly clear that saving enough for retirement is a challenge that many people will have a hard time meeting. Part of the reason is that even if they save diligently, the expenses associated with many 401(k)s will whittle down the total substantially from what it might have been otherwise. Without the match, workers could be in real trouble.

According to the U.S. Department of Labor, an employee with a 401(k) balance of $25,000 and 35 years until retirement will grow his account balance to $227,000 at a 7 percent rate of return with fees at 0.5 percent. Up the fees by a percentage point to 1.5 percent, which is what investment resource Morningstar says is average,  and this employee's balance will drop to $163,000 at retirement, a 28 percent difference. Of course, these calculations don't take into account additional contributions, but they certainly illustrate the effect of fees.

In its report on 401(k) matches, Towers Watson says to corporate clients that "matching contributions are a major tool in enticing employees to participate in (defined contribution) savings plans ... and plan participation will likely decline without them," causing problems for employers down the road because their older employees might not save enough to retire in a "timely and efficient manner."

There isn't much evidence that this concern is keeping too many employers up nights, but it certainly should cause workers to lose some sleep.

«
»
Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
2 Comments
Evan
November 04, 2011 at 8:35 am

A company match is a great benefit that every employee should take advantage of if available, but the absence of a company match should not deter an employee from contributing to their 401(k). Saving is key when building a nest egg.

Ray
November 03, 2011 at 7:43 am

"There isn't much evidence that this concern is keeping too many employers up nights..."

I don't know, many of the senior executives might be worried about this...(end sarcasm). How about a suspended match, then a discontinued plan (that's what happened to me)? The maximum IRA contribution is not enough.