Retirement Blog

Finance Blogs » Retirement Blog » Retire from retirement saving

Retire from retirement saving

By Jennie L. Phipps ·
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Posted: 1 pm ET

If the thought of delaying retirement depresses you, try thinking about retirement planning differently.

If you're 60 and you've saved at least four times your salary, then Christine Fahlund, senior financial planner at T. Rowe Price, suggests that you continue to work but stop saving, and then use the money you would have saved to buy the boat or take the trip you want.

The trick is to avoid taking Social Security, which will increase in value 8 percent per year between ages 62 and 70, and let the power of investments increase your nest egg without anymore help from you. T. Rowe Price calculates that giving your nest egg time to grow without touching it while you continue to live on earned income alone until you are at least 66 will improve your financial situation significantly compared to retiring at 62. If you can wait until 70 -- even if you haven't saved another dime since you turned 62 -- you'll still be sitting pretty.

Fahlund provides these caveats:

  • Leave at least 50 percent of your nest egg in equities. In this environment, that's the only way you'll make a reasonable return. If you can't figure out how to earn 7 percent annually on your money (or you can't stomach doing what it takes), you might have to rethink this approach.
  • Having multiple streams of income enhances this strategy. If you know you'll get a pension at 65, you're ahead of the game.
  • If your employer offers a generous 401(k) match, it is probably a good idea to continue to save enough to get that match. "Don't leave money on the table," Fahlund says.
  • Having the house paid off -- or nearly so -- is another thing that makes this game plan work better.
  • Cut back on work slowly. If the higher-earning half of a couple can delay taking Social Security until age 70, not only will that person get about double what he or she would have at 62, but also Social Security is indexed for inflation, so the increased payment provides longevity insurance.

"There is a lot of value in enjoying life while you can," Fahlund says. "So many investors are despairing that they are going to have to hunker down and forget about enjoying their 60s. We say turn that into a glass that is half full with numbers that work."

Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
June 03, 2011 at 11:07 pm

If you can afford to invest the social security dollars and get 5%, and you assume a 3% COLA once you start collecting, you will be well into your 80's by the time you collect as much money starting at 66 as you would if you started at 62. You'll die before you collect as much if you wait until 72. Not to mention the possibility of dying young and never collecting much of it at all.

Too many retirement planners (and articles by same) look at the simplistic assumption that the longer you wait the more you get. You need to understand your retirement assets and projected expenses before making this decision.

April 15, 2011 at 6:55 pm

One note, don't postpone Social Security too far that either you drop dead between 66 and 70 or you receive less payments than your break even if you would have retired at 66. If you aren't in good health or you don't have good genes...take that money at 66, perhaps even 62!

My poor mom maxed out SS income for 30 years only to die at 56!