Retirement Blog

Finance Blogs » Retirement Blog » Another thought about RMDs

Another thought about RMDs

By Jennie L. Phipps ·
Sunday, October 9, 2011
Posted: 9 am ET

I wrote about required minimum distributions, or RMDs, on Thursday -- something that many people consider an annoying -- and possibly unfair -- part of retirement planning. Here's another way to look at them.

At 70½, the IRS requires that you start taking annual distributions from your tax-advantaged retirement savings or face a 50 percent penalty. The object of this law is to require all retirees to pay taxes on this money before they die. The RMD is generally spread over about 26 years. Or you can use the recalculation method that allows you to refigure your life expectancy every year. Using this method, you never totally spend down your account.

However, you calculate it, don't forget that Uncle Sam will get his share one way or other. If you wait until you're 70½ before you take anything out of your tax-advantaged accounts, you run the risk of bumping yourself into a higher tax bracket when you start taking the RMD. Another unpleasant possibility is that you'll die and whoever inherits your tax-advantaged savings will have to pay the taxes -- making it less of an inheritance than you would probably have liked to have left your children.

So instead of waiting until Uncle Sam forces you to take an RMD, a better idea might be to start spending the amount of the RMD earlier  -- when you're younger and likely to enjoy it more.

Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
1 Comment
End the Ponzi Scheme
October 11, 2011 at 7:43 am

Let me get this straight. If you are overly successful in investing your retirement dollars it is a bad thing because you have to pay more taxes? Your kids will get less because the value is too much, what kind of reasoning is that?

I'd love to have that problem, it means I've successfully executed a plan to have a big nest egg.

Wait, I forgot the goal of this column is to get everyone dependent on social insecurity, and need the government to meet all your needs. Nevermind, the first question is redundant now I see.