Mortgages Blog

Finance Blogs » Mortgages » New rules invalid? Not so fast

New rules invalid? Not so fast

By Polyana da Costa · Bankrate.com
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Posted: 10 am ET

The lending industry spent much of 2012 fearing the avalanche of consumer-friendly mortgage rules that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was working on. Uncertainty is not good for the lending market, they said. After some of these major rules were issued recently, that anxiety eased somewhat as lenders and consumer groups applauded most aspects of the rules.

But just as lenders thought they could put the days of uncertainty behind, questions were brought up: What if the appointment of the CFPB’s head is ruled unconstitutional? What if all the new mortgage rules are overturned as a result?

The hype began after a federal court of appeals ruled that President Barack Obama's recess appointment of three new members to the National Labor Relations Board violated the Constitution. The appointments were invalid because the Senate was technically not in recess on that day, the court says. Richard Cordray, the CFPB director, was appointed on the same day as the NLRB's members.

A CFPB spokesperson says, "The bureau is not a party in the recently decided case, and the court's ruling has no direct effect on the bureau."

The ruling certainly raises questions and takes away some of the certainty that lenders thought they were beginning to have regarding mortgage regulations, says Julia Gordon, director of housing finance and policy for the Center for American Progress.

"The housing market needs these rules to be in place," she says.

Before anyone hits the panic button, put big emphasis on the "ifs" behind these questions.

The NLRB case still has to go through the Supreme Court. If the Supreme Court upholds the decision, Cordray's appointment could be called into question. But even if that becomes the case, it wouldn't automatically invalidate the recently released mortgage rules.

"A conclusion that the Cordray appointment was invalid would leave a number of issues to be resolved as to the Bureau’s authority," says David Beam, an attorney and partner at K&L Gates in Washington, D.C. "For example, certain provisions of Dodd-Frank might be interpreted to say that certain powers conferred on the Bureau could be exercised only by a validly installed director."

But the courts might still rule that the bureau has the authority to take a number of significant actions even without a director, Beam says.

"In short, if courts finally decide that Cordray's appointment was invalid, it is possible that they will invalidate some of the actions that the Bureau took, but not all," he says. “In other words, the result might not be all or nothing."

And remember that while there may be questions about the rules, Gordon says, "There are certainly no questions about the statute." Some of the major rules that the CFPB has issued recently -- including the qualified mortgage or ability-to-repay rule -- were mandated by the Dodd-Frank law. And with or without Cordray, Dodd-Frank isn't going anywhere.

«
»
Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
4 Comments
Rick
February 25, 2013 at 3:49 pm

This new rule about "ability to repay" is like closing th banrn door after the horses have left. Banks and lenders in the mortgage industry have been doing this ever since this whole thing went backwards. If people only knew what went on in the background to verify the fact that this person can afford this home, and the scrutiny these loans go through to make sure it is a good loan is unbelievable. If the CFBP really wanted to do something for the buyer, they would require the lenders to stick to the debt to income rules that fannie mae, freddie mac and FHA have in their guidelines instead of allowing buyers to have a back end debt ratio reaching 55%. This is a receipie for disaster. The quality of the loan would be better and the chance for default would be less if they would just lower the debt to income requirments. I personally think the debt to income should be hard and fast at 35% of the gross income or less. This would almost insure the buyer to be a successful owner, and the chance of default would drop dramtically. This would also drop the price of housing because many Americans have debt to income ratio's above that level. But that is a different dicussion for a different time.

eman
January 30, 2013 at 7:28 pm

pesident obama and all the gov should invistigats all the banks for forclosure houses for low income people. and they refusing to make a deal to return the house for the people. i didnt know in the begining that there is gov agency help to avoid forclosure. i was behind in my payment. one of the gov agency try to deal with boa but they dont want to accepet any deal to return the house for please. the gov have to do somthing espicaily to the disable people who are living just for hope

Matt
January 30, 2013 at 12:43 pm

President Obama circumventing the Constitution is discusting. Waiting till Saturday to appoint people & claiming congress wasn't available for confirmation - STINKS. You are NOT a king Mr President, we have a Constitution & YOU need to follow it.