Mortgages Blog

Finance Blogs » Mortgages Blog » Making abusive loans better

Making abusive loans better

By Polyana da Costa ·
Wednesday, July 11, 2012
Posted: 8 am ET

What do you do when you can't eliminate abusive lending practices? You settle for making them less abusive.

That's the message I get as I read the CFPB's recent proposal to protect borrowers who take out risky loans.

The proposed rule is discussed in the same 1,100-page document that I told you about earlier, in which the CFPB describes simplified forms that are supposed to make mortgages easier for consumers to understand.

The rule would cap fees and ban certain practices related to high-risk loans. It proposes an expansion of the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act of 1994, or HOEPA. The act was created to address abusive practices in refinancing and home-equity loans with high interest rates or high fees.

For the purpose of this rule, when you think of a high-risk loan, don't think of all those loans that were given out to borrowers who couldn't afford mortgages during the housing boom.  Those were just risky. The risk we are discussing here is more on the level of swimming with sharks.

Under the proposal, a high-risk loan would include:

• Loans with an annual percentage rate that exceeds the average prime offer rate by 6.5 percentage points for the first mortgage and 8.5 percentage points for the second mortgage. Today, that would mean a loan with an APR higher than 10.19 percent.

• A loan with points and fees that exceed 5 percent of the total transaction amount. Say you're getting a mortgage for $200,000 and paying more than $10,000 in points and lender fees alone; that would be considered a high-risk loan.

• A loan for which the lender may charge a prepayment penalty more than three years after the loan closes.

These are the types of loans borrowers in their right minds should never get.

But if you like living on the edge or simply had a few beers and decided to get one of these loans anyway, rest assured, the CFPB is working on some rules to protect you.

The proposed rule would cap late fees and ban balloon payments, or large lump-sum payments due at the end of the loan term. The rule would ban prepayment penalties. And guess what? It would allow borrowers to request a payoff letter without a fee. The most plausible part of this document and the part that I hope will work, is the rule would require the borrower to receive housing counseling before taking out a risky mortgage. Here is where I hope borrowers realize the big mistake they are about to make.

The CFPB will accept comment from the public on this proposed rule until Sept. 7.

Follow me on Twitter @Polyanad

Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
July 17, 2012 at 12:45 pm

A bad credit history of the borrower is certainly a risk for any lender even if the loan amount is smaller. However, you will not be facing any hurdles in borrowing some cash from 12 month loans no credit check lenders.

Lewis Staples
July 15, 2012 at 12:36 pm

I’m not much into reading, but somehow I got to read many articles in your webpage. It’s fantastic how interesting it is for me to visit you very often.For your posting really helps people worrying on their personal loans.