Investing Blog

Finance Blogs » Investing » Do fund managers reduce risk?

Do fund managers reduce risk?

By Sheyna Steiner · Bankrate.com
Friday, April 29, 2011
Posted: 10 am ET

Investors face a steep learning curve when it comes to putting together their own portfolio. A workplace 401(k) may be the first time they've ever given a second of thought to stocks and bonds and they're faced with a bewildering array of mutual funds from which to choose.

According to investing theory, asset class selection is nearly as important as the actual mutual funds themselves. That doesn't make choosing investments easy however, particularly for investors concerned with managing short-term risk.

At the outset, investors have to decide if they believe that a mutual fund manager can protect them from crashes and outperform the market. Actively managed funds are, in general, more expensive than index funds. The main reason for the price difference is the cost of the manager and other analysts that research investments for the fund.

Underpinning the choice of active versus passive investing is the complicated theory or philosophy of efficient markets. Are all investments in the market priced correctly or are there some inefficiencies in there that a savvy manager can find and exploit?

Index funds follow market indices. A good index fund should hew closely to the index it follows. If the index the fund mimics is the Standard & Poor's 500 and it's up by a certain number of points, your index should be as well. The basic theory of indexing is that over time, most managers aren't going to beat the market, or even pad the downside, so why pay more for underperformance?

"The lower you keep the cost, the lower the hurdle is that you have to stretch in terms of risk. If you keep your costs down you can afford to take less risk, because you don't need to incrementally get that much higher of a return just to break even," says Tyler Bartlett, Certified Financial Planner, financial adviser at Merriman Capital Management in Seattle, Wash.

Active mutual funds contain hand-picked investments based on the funds goals and objectives. They rely on the skill of managers to outperform their benchmarks.

"If the manager or team is doing what they set out to do we think that over time they should outperform the passively managed index," says Michael Masiello, president of Masiello and Associates in Rochester, N.Y.

"I'd rather go with a manager who is following a strategy and a discipline versus an unmanaged and unwieldy, bizarre public driving an index. Last I checked the public is the one who makes all of the investing mistakes, do I want to connect my investing strategy to them?" he says.

Managed funds do beat index funds in many – but not most -- cases. Finding the funds that will outperform this year rather than last year is where it gets tricky – because in most cases actively managed funds do worse than index funds, on the way up as well as on the way down.

Standard & Poor's releases a report twice a year, the Standard & Poor's Indices Versus Active Scorecard report. In 2008, the worst year for investors in recent history, indices outperformed active funds in eight out of nine domestic equity categories.

"The belief that bear markets favor active management is a myth," the year-end 2008 report concluded.

In 2008 the percent of active funds outperformed by benchmarks was hardly a landslide across all categories though.

For instance, 22 percent of large-cap value funds were beaten by indices in 2008 compared to 90 percent of large-cap growth funds that were outperformed.

Percent of active funds outperformed by benchmarks

  2008 2005 through 2010
Large cap growth 90 82
Large cap core 52 63
Large cap value 22 34.67
     
Mid cap growth 89 82.14
Mid cap core 62.3 82
Mid cap value 67.1 71.76
     
Small cap growth 95.5 72.68
Small cap core 82.5 60.21
Small cap value 72.6 51.81

From the Standard & Poor's Indices Versus Active Funds Scorecard, year-end 2008 and 2010

Clearly investors benefit from actively managed funds but it does introduce another element of risk into the equation: picking the right fund manager. Otherwise, it would be easier and cheaper to go with the index.

«
»
Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
1 Comment
David Sherman
May 01, 2011 at 6:34 pm

~~ I do not choose active management. W. Bush has made me a day trader. Sleeping mostly on cash is the best way for a non professional to reduce risk. ~~ Truth is most index funds is where I would put money if I had to be in funds. Some ETF's have enough yield to be interesting when things are not at extremes. Oil will go down, gold I do not care about very often. ~~

It is time for the Democrats to SIMPLIFY our TAX CODE. No need to raise rates if every hedge fund manager and CEO paid more then 15% if that in taxes. See my Facebook page Chesley Sullenberger For President.