Insurance Blog

Finance Blogs » Insurance Blog » ‘Obamacare’ survives election

‘Obamacare’ survives election

By Jay MacDonald ·
Friday, November 9, 2012
Posted: 10 am ET

Say what you will about health care reform. For an infant, it has proven to be quite the survivor.

When President Barack Obama signed into law the Affordable Care Act, aka "Obamacare," in March 2010, he might as well have scrawled a bull's-eye on its cover sheet. Such was the immediate onslaught of opposition to the landmark legislation of his first term in office.

Despite a Congressional Budget Office assessment that this interconnected tune-up of Medicare, expansion of Medicaid, and course correction of American health insurance would cut future deficits and save Medicare money, Republican opponents pounced hard and heavy.

Remember the old "government takeover of health care" rhetoric? Or the "death panel" phase? Those claims may not have had a sound footing in fact, but they sure made for scary sound bites on the stump, didn't they?

Then came the lawsuit filed by 26 states, charging that Congress overstepped its authority in several respects, most notably with the so-called individual mandate provision that requires Americans for the first time to acquire health insurance or pay a fine. The legal fight ignited a separate firestorm over whether religious institutions opposed to contraception and family planning should be exempt from a requirement that their health plans provide employees with access to these things.

After months of deliberation, the U.S. Supreme Court in June upheld the bulk of the Affordable Care Act, including the individual mandate, and the baby survived another scare.

Tuesday night, the kid made it over one final hurdle as Obama defeated Republican challenger Mitt Romney, who had vowed to halt health care reform on his first day in office.

As a result, the following benefits of health care reform will proceed:

  • The end of coverage denials due to previous medical conditions.
  • A prohibition on lifetime or annual dollar limits on most health insurance benefits.
  • A ban on rate discrimination based on sex.
  • Free preventive services, including cancer screenings and vaccinations, for Medicare beneficiaries and those with employer or individual coverage.
  • The closing of the Medicare prescription drug "doughnut hole."
  • Expanded coverage for young adults to age 26 under their parents' health insurance.
  • A requirement that insurers spend at least 80 percent of your insurance premium directly on your care or refund you the difference.
  • Additional funding for Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program, or CHIP.
  • The opening of the new state insurance exchanges in 2014, expected to bring affordable health insurance to an estimated 16 million uninsured Americans.

Congratulations, kid. Here's hoping the next four years will treat you a little kinder.

You also can follow me on Twitter @omnisaurus.

Subscribe to great Bankrate newsletters today!

Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
November 17, 2012 at 11:39 am

You are way off base, on one hand, you are correct on the positive attributes you ascribe to the Affordable Health Care Act. On the other hand, what you don't do is discuss the downside to people receiving benefits at their jobs. For example companies that provide more than 10K a year in benefits to an employee will be taxed an extra 40%. Guess what benefits will be cut. Companies will now disclose on your W-2 what your benefits are worth, how long will it be before the government starts taxing those benefits? Maybe they will just tax the rich, probably not because the rich don’t make up a big enough portion of the total US to be meaning full in this instance. Additionally there are significant administrative costs what will untimely cause health care costs to raise and when they do us the people will be forced to shoulder the burden. I understand many companies are planning on eliminating the heath care, opting to pay a fine to the government of about $2K per year and either provide some cash to their employees which is taxable to the employee and allowing them to buy health care in the open market which will surely not be as good of coverage as they can buy today. In theory what they Obama was trying to do is wonderful but in practice will be just another waste of tax dollars funding a poorly run government agency.

Jeff Macfarlane
November 11, 2012 at 2:19 am

I just can't see how any insurance company that is required to insure people without regard to pre-existing conditions or gender can survive. The way insurance companies can afford to pay health care costs for those who are really sick or seriously injured is by receiving premiums from healthy people that they never spend on their own health care. Also, women, like it or not, require more health care because of pregnancy and bearing children. To tell an insurer that they cannot charge her more for insurance is taking away money from the "pot". This sounds too good to be true.