Federal Reserve Blog

Finance Blogs » Federal Reserve Blog » Is growth sustainable?
Greg McBride

Is growth sustainable?

By Greg McBride · Bankrate.com
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Posted: 9 am ET

The minutes of the March 16 meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee were released Tuesday afternoon. The Fed remains committed to keeping rates low, citing the likelihood of only moderate economic growth over the next two years.

In preparation for the meeting, the Fed staff said that both economic growth and core inflation wouldn’t rise as much as they thought. The minutes also refer to an uptick in consumer spending but noted that income “appeared less supportive of spending.”

This begs the question of whether we’re in a sustainable recovery. The stock market clearly thinks so and recent increases in bond yields indicate that even bond investors may be warming to the idea. Another take on this isn’t whether the recovery is sustainable, but is the current pace of recovery sustainable? High unemployment and anemic growth in household income would suggest it is not, and the Fed seems wary about that was well.

Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
Greg McBride
April 16, 2010 at 10:10 am

Ben Bernanke won't come out and say it but keeping short-term rates at near zero levels in order to help banks earn their way out of trouble is definitely part of the game plan. And all the more reason why the Fed is in no hurry to raise interest rates. Yes, savers are getting drubbed now and "the beatings will continue until morale improves" as the saying goes. Unfortunately savers may end up paying an even higher price in the long run if inflation takes off.

April 16, 2010 at 9:51 am


The last two times the spread on 10-year Treasuries over 1-year Treasury Bills was this steep (over 3 percentage points), was in 1992 and 2003. Both times strong recoveries were under way. It seems to me the Fed may be keeping rates low to help banks continue to pump up their profits - another bailout mechanism to help the industry recover from poor decisions. Unfortunately, taxpayers and savers continue to pay the bill.