Banking Blog

Finance Blogs » Banking Blog » Court halts fake debt collectors

Court halts fake debt collectors

By Marcie Geffner ·
Friday, November 1, 2013
Posted: 2 pm ET

A U.S. district court has put a stop to a group of interrelated companies that allegedly used deceptive and threatening tactics to try to collect supposed payday loans that consumers didn't owe or didn't owe to those companies. The operation was halted at the request of the Federal Trade Commission after an investigation.

According to the FTC, the companies used automated telephone calls and voice mail messages that threatened legal action and arrest unless consumers responded within a few days. These illegal tactics generated millions of dollars in payments for nonexistent debts and nearly 3,000 complaints to an FTC online complaint database.

The court order froze the companies' assets so consumers who were victimized might have a chance to recoup some of their money.

According to the FTC, the companies operated in Atlanta and Cleveland and used such deceptive business names as Global Legal Services, Allied Litigation Group, United Judgment & Appeals, Dockets Liens & Seizures and United Judgment Center, all of which wrongly implied that the company had legal powers.

According to court documents, consumers were falsely informed that if they didn't pay the debts, their bank accounts would be closed, their wages would be garnished, they would face felony fraud charges, they would have to appear in court thousands of miles away from their home or they would be arrested at their workplace.

The complaint names the following defendants: Lisa J. Jeter, Nichole C. Anderson, Hope V. Wilson, Angela J. Triplett, DeMarra J. Massey, and their companies, Pinnacle Payment Services, Velocity Payment Solutions, Heritage Capital Services, Performance Payment Processing, Credit Source Plus in Ohio and Georgia, Reliable Resolution and Premium Express Processing in Ohio and Atlanta.

The FTC files a complaint when it has reason to believe the law has been or is being violated and a proceeding is in the public interest. The case must still be decided by the court.

Consumers should be on the lookout for fake debt collectors.

A debt collector might be a fake if he or she demands payment for a loan you don't recognize, refuses to give you a mailing address or phone number, asks you for personal financial or sensitive information or uses high-pressure tactics such as threatening to report you to a law enforcement agency or have you arrested, according to the FTC.

If a caller refuses to give you his or her name, company, street address and telephone number, don't pay the supposed debt or discuss the details of it until you receive a written validation notice that includes the amount of the debt, name of the creditor and your rights under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Have you been approached by someone who demanded payment for a debt you're unaware of?

Follow me on Twitter: @marciegeff.

Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
Daniel Groobert
April 17, 2014 at 9:56 pm

The bank that are the worst are resallers , aka GE, BOA, AmTrust , etc.,....They are almost legal crooks, and are being fined billions, but that is after the fact. So the goast still lives in the process and just say NO!

Janine Yanness
April 17, 2014 at 11:19 am

Hello,One of the biggest concerns I have with all scams listed is the legalization of SPOOF cards known as SPOOFING. This is still legal and has been since 1995. This tool has allowed more individuals to commit major white crime. It happened to me to the toon of $80,000 which the banks/institutions have denied all claims for me to recover the funds. (TD Bank, Beneficial Bank, Fidelity Investments and Nationwide Insurance. These severe acts caused me to go into bankruptcy. My family was so greatly impacted. The legalization of SPOOFING needs to be banned. If there are lawyers out there willing to fight these institutions on a contingency, I would be open to discuss it further.