Banking Blog

Finance Blogs » Banking » Could Cyprus bank tax happen here?

Could Cyprus bank tax happen here?

By Claes Bell · Bankrate.com
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Posted: 5 pm ET

Imagine finding out one morning that the federal government was going to drain 6.75 percent to 9.9 percent of your bank account balance to cover a bank bailout.

That's exactly what was slated to happen to depositors in the island nation of Cyprus, who were being asked to foot the bill for a bailout of the country's oversized banking industry. Under the plan, depositors with more than 20,000 euros in the bank would have been hit with a special tax, despite what was supposed to be up to 100,000 euros worth of deposit insurance.

The haircut for depositors was put forth as a condition for the bailout by the European Union as a condition for supplying the funds for the bailout, says Mark Williams, a professor of finance at Boston University, former Federal Reserve Bank examiner, and author of "Uncontrolled Risk," a book about the collapse of Lehman Brothers.

After a public outcry, the parliament of Cyprus rejected the deal, which would have been terrible for both depositors and the stability of the banking system, Williams says.

"It's a clear example of politicians making rash decisions without understanding the implications of capital markets, and also how banks are intertwined within our capital markets," Williams says. "Savers and depositors themselves provide basically the lifeblood that allows the banking system to function. As soon as they start getting penalized, then that actually undermines the credibility of our banking system and it creates bank runs."

Had the plan been implemented, it's likely Cyprian depositors would have withdrawn their cash as soon as they could and put it into hard assets such as gold, slowing the country's economic growth. Ironically, that would have made it less likely to be able to pay back the bailout funds, Williams says.

"(The European Union) cut their nose off to spite their face," he said.

Fortunately, even if banks in the U.S. need another bailout, its unlikely depositors would face a plan similar to the one rejected by the Cyprian parliament, especially in light of the resulting turmoil in financial markets.

"The Cyprus case study will be used to actually counter any movements that would go toward penalizing depositors," he says.

In fact, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. strictly prohibits banks from directly passing on the fee they pay for FDIC insurance to depositors, he says.

What do you think? Would you withdraw your cash from a bank account to avoid a "bailout tax"? Are depositors the ones who should pay when banks fail?

Follow me on Twitter: @ClaesBell.

«
»
Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
7 Comments
jorn
March 22, 2013 at 5:38 pm

With all of the horribe things happening in Europe the last couple years, are they really any better than just letting the failing countries just declare bankruptcy and/or leave the EU? Granted it's not a good thing, but neither is 25% unemployment, smothering taxes, and a country losing it's sovernty to a continental central bank

Claes Bell
March 22, 2013 at 1:05 pm

Yeah I mean nobody likes getting low interest rates, but that's a lot different than a levy of almost 10 percent being taken out of your account.

Martin Garbo
March 22, 2013 at 12:03 pm

We already have a Cyprus like banking crisis with our savings being stolen as a result of artificially low interest rates.

Patrick
March 20, 2013 at 3:21 pm

My money would be among the first withdrawn from the bank if such a plan was to be implemented here. The Government already takes a lot of my money (SS, Medicare, Federal Income Tax, Sales Tax, Outrageous Property Tax, road tolls, car tabs, gas tax, etc. etc.). Another 6.75 percent to 9.9 percent would be infuriating as it would drain at least $1350 more from $20,000. Not to mention it would cause serious harm to a banks health.

Lakis Velotris
March 20, 2013 at 10:19 am

Yet another Unbridled Trojan Horse. The Greek Church begat Islam and COmmunism by rejecting Original Sin. Time for Greeks to fly off to another planet.

Commonman
March 19, 2013 at 9:40 pm

If anyone pays because a bank fails, it should be the officers and/or government regulators that drove it failure. I mean personally accountable in many cases. When they cant pay the tab, just add it on their income tax bill and let the IRS collect it, since they can take pretty much anything and everything.