Banking Blog

Finance Blogs » Banking » BofA to charge for debit cards

BofA to charge for debit cards

By Claes Bell, CFA · Bankrate.com
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Posted: 3 pm ET

It looks like charging debit card fees is going to start becoming the norm, at least for large national banks. The Wall Street Journal is reporting today Bank of America will start hitting customers with a $5 a month fee for using a debit card at the beginning of next year:

The fee will apply to customers with various checking accounts during any month they use their debit card to make a purchase. The fee will not apply to customers who do not use their debit card to make a purchase or who only use it to make ATM transactions.

Bank of America is trying to cushion revenue losses it expects to incur from new caps on the fees merchants pay when a customer uses a debit card at their stores. In June, the Federal Reserve Board finalized rules capping such fees at 24 cents per transaction, compared with a current average of 44 cents.

Bank of America has said it expects the caps, which take effect Oct. 1, to erase $2 billion in revenue annually. Industrywide, the caps, which apply to banks with $10 billion and more in assets, could wipe out $6.6 billion in annual revenue for banks, according to an August report from Javelin Strategy and Research.

It's no surprise we're seeing banks floating these plans now. As the WSJ article points out, the Durbin limits on swipe fees take effect on Saturday, and banks are still scrambling for ways to deal with it.

Maria Aspan over at American Banker has a column on the move today, titled "New B of A Fee May Hasten Debit's Demise," which argues this is just the beginning of an industrywide abandonment of debit card payments:

Many consumers prefer to use debit cards to credit cards, and debit became increasingly popular during the recession as consumers cut back on buying all but household necessities.

Some banks, including Wells Fargo & Co., have already started testing fees for customers who pay with their debit cards. But now Bank of America, which does business with one out of every two U.S. households, is killing debit's popularity in one fell swoop.

"Because the bank is so big, other institutions will likely follow suit, so you'll have a part of the population that probably begins to move away from being active debit card users," says Mary Beth Sullivan, managing partner at consultancy Capital Performance Group Inc.

Bank of America is also consciously driving away some customers who cannot afford, or will be alienated by, the new fee.

I think Aspan may be right that BofA has made a calculated decision to let go of a pretty big group of customers who won't pay the $5 debit card fee. But I don't think what we're seeing here is the beginning of the end for debit.

Sure, banks are trying to figure out ways to make debit cards profitable, but it's important to remember that both banks and consumers still have a lot of reasons to like debit cards.

First off, 24 cents -- the new limit for swipe fees -- may not be as much as the 44 cents banks are used to getting, but it's not nothing. I think even at that level, banks will still be making a good bit of money on debit card purchases, particularly considering the swipe-fee hikes on small purchases coming down the pike from Visa and MasterCard.

Debit cards also eliminate several of the risk factors and costs banks have to account for with the other type of card payment, credit cards. When a consumer makes a debit card purchase, they are directly using their own funds. The bank isn't supplying the money itself, and so doesn't have to tie up its own funds or run the risk that it won't be paid back.

And while there's still a risk of fraud losses associated with debit transactions, I think it's likely that fraud losses are lower on debit cards, since a big proportion of debit transactions are made with a PIN, which greatly reduces the risk of fraud. The most recent data I could find comparing credit to debit card fraud losses for issuers came in a 2010 Kansas Fed report, which had annual credit card losses for issuers at $1.24 billion and debit losses at $762 million, a difference of nearly half.

Add to that the fact that banks can hold off paying back customers for fraud losses while they investigate, and debit cards have a lot of appeal for banks, even if they won't make the kind of money for banks credit cards can.

On the consumer side, I don't think people are ready to abandon the combination of pay-as-you-go budgeting with the convenience of plastic that debit cards represent. Debit cards' share of U.S. payments has risen dramatically over the last few years, with a 2010 Fed study finding 35 percent of noncash payments were made via debit, amounting to nearly 40 billion transactions.

I agree with Aspan that a lot of frugal and money-conscious folks will probably either switch to small banks, credit unions and online banks who will keep free checking and debit cards alive, or abandon debit cards altogether.

But it seems likely a lot of people will overlook the fee, or decide they're willing to pay $5 a month to avoid having to carry cash or running up a big credit card balance by accident. I think financial reporters of all stripes overestimate the importance of fees to consumer purchasing decisions in the same way political reporters overestimate the importance of "messaging" to elections.

It's worth noting, too, that for the designers of the Durbin amendment and the changes to regulation E, debit card fees are a feature, not a bug. The whole idea behind these changes was to increase the transparency of the debit-card fee structure. Now, instead of debit card fees being embedded into retail prices and massive overdraft fees levied on consumers, they're right there on monthly banks statements for everyone to see. If nothing else, that should help keep banks' overall debit fees from expanding as quickly as they have in the past, which was what Durbin advocates were hoping for.

What do you think? Is debit on its deathbed? Or will it carry on despite new regulations?

«
»
Bankrate wants to hear from you and encourages comments. We ask that you stay on topic, respect other people's opinions, and avoid profanity, offensive statements, and illegal content. Please keep in mind that we reserve the right to (but are not obligated to) edit or delete your comments. Please avoid posting private or confidential information, and also keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

By submitting a post, you agree to be bound by Bankrate's terms of use. Please refer to Bankrate's privacy policy for more information regarding Bankrate's privacy practices.
27 Comments
Henry
September 30, 2011 at 8:54 am

Two things. Why would you bank with BoA, the prestige?
Second, the newly arrived cell phones have NFC to allow electronic transactions. Google has introduced Google wallet. Is that going to be the next big thing. Bank of Google.

Pam
September 30, 2011 at 8:06 am

Back to the credit union I go. This fee is ridiculous. It costs banks more to process checks than debit transactions. Perhaps we should all go back to check writing. It's a chore I would gladly accept rather than pay to use my own money.

Martin
September 30, 2011 at 7:41 am

The five largest banks in the U.S. (JP Morgan Chase, Citibank, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and HSBC) are carrying $238 TRILLION dollars in derivative exposure. JP Morgan alone is carrying $78 TRILLION in derivative exposure BY ITSELF.

The total GDP of the United States is $14.5 Trillion.

The total GDP of China is $6 Trillion.

The total land mass on earth is 36.8 billion acres. If every acre of land on earth was “sold” for $6467 per acre, that would total $238 Trillion.

JP Morgan BY ITSELF has derivative exposure equal to over FIVE TIMES the value of the entire US GDP.

Anais
September 30, 2011 at 7:34 am

Yes, so what bank can I switch to that wont charge the fees, in NYC?

Martin
September 30, 2011 at 7:17 am

APPLAUSE FOR RUTH!!! Finally.

Martin
September 30, 2011 at 6:42 am

The First Bank of Sealy Posturepedic. Anyone who banks with the likes of any of the big banks is a fool. How many times will you let the banks steal from you before you wise up? Let's do the math...there's approximately 200 million consumer bank accounts that will be affected. Multiply that by average annual charges that might times, a conservative estimate of...say, 60 per person(per account). Holy %**t!!! 12 Billion more for the guys who needed bailouts and continue to destroy our economic stability. Take your money out of the banks!!! I use Check Cashing Stores exclusively. They charge 1.5% of each check if you have an account with them. In my case, it saved me 37.3% annually from what I was taking on in charges from "My Bank". Get smart and dump the system it is time for real change.

Kevin
September 29, 2011 at 10:15 pm

I've been a BofA customer for nearly 20 years now. After hearing of the "debit" monthly fee, I've immediately decided to move my checking away from BofA. That fee offsets almost all interest I earn on my savings account, which by the way I moved away from BofA because they dropped interest rates off the charts. Greed from all angles has cost BofA a long-time customer. A combination of government meddling, which backfired because greedy vendors honestly won't pass their savings from lower swipe fees on to the consumers; and greedy bank fees have forced me to alter my habits and move my cash.

Meagan
September 29, 2011 at 9:45 pm

I think you're right that debit cards are here to stay. They do make budgeting easier and are super convenient. I wonder if there will be a way to waive the $5 fee, such as direct deposit or carrying a minimum balance. I for one will be switching banks if this fee does impact my wallet.

justin
September 29, 2011 at 8:11 pm

So what bank can I switch to that wont charge the fees?

ruth
September 29, 2011 at 6:35 pm

No problem, I will just start using checks again and pay with cash.
Thanks for the heads up Oh and by the way, i will move my money back to the credit union.