Municipal bankruptcies are nothing new, but several filings over the past year — punctuated by the July 2013 bankruptcy in Detroit — have transformed Chapter 9 of the U.S. bankruptcy code for municipal reorganization from a relatively obscure body of law into a hot topic. Residents of struggling cities are wondering what the possibility of bankruptcy means for them.

“We’ve had cities go bankrupt in the past, but usually those are isolated events that occur because the city lost a big lawsuit or had a local catastrophe,” says Franklin C. Adams, a bankruptcy lawyer in Riverside, Calif. “What’s different and quite troubling is that larger economic conditions seem to be the cause, and we haven’t seen that since the Great Depression.”

Congress enacted federal bankruptcy legislation for municipalities in the 1930s. Between 1991 and 2012, there have been 217 muni bankruptcies, according to data from the U.S. court system. Of those, 20 were filed just last year. These are some of the more recent filings have been noteworthy:

  • Detroit: The one-time auto capital of the world filed for bankruptcy protection in July 2013, citing more than $18 billion in debt. It marks the largest civic bankruptcy by amount of debt and by population. About 700,000 residents live in the Motor City.
  • Jefferson County, Ala.: The county filed in November 2011, citing more than $4 billion in debt. Before Detroit’s filing this month, the filing was the largest civic bankruptcy in U.S. history in terms of dollar amount, according to Reuters.
  • Stockton, Calif.: The city filed for bankruptcy in June 2012. At the time, it was the largest American city, in terms of population, to seek protection from creditors under Chapter 9. City officials estimate that Stockton, which has just fewer than 300,000 residents, could owe creditors as much as $1 billion, according to CBSNews.com.
  • Harrisburg, Pa.: The city has more than $340 million in debt, but back in 2011 state Sen. Jeff Piccola banned “third-class cities” from filing bankruptcy, leading a judge to block the bankruptcy. According to Reuters, the ban was extended in 2012. Currently the city has been auctioning off Wild West artifacts in an effort to raise money.

What is Chapter 9?

In many ways, a Chapter 9 filing is akin to Chapters 11 and 13 of the bankruptcy code, which deal with business and personal reorganizations, respectively. Under all three scenarios, debtors get a reprieve for paying creditors while they propose and implement a restructuring plan. But unlike private citizens and companies, municipalities are sovereign entities, which present an unusual wrinkle, Adams says.

“Realistically, the court doesn’t have as much power to force the city to do anything,” Adams says. “So, unlike other provisions of the bankruptcy code where the creditors have a vote on the reorganization plan, the city has a lot more latitude.”

Once a municipality is bankrupt, it can cut costs, which usually means fewer services such as firefighting, garbage collection and library branches. Or it can increase revenue by raising taxes. Usually, it’s a combination of both, Adams says. But real change is often a matter of political will.

What happens to services?

“Municipal bankruptcies usually mean a reduction in the size, scope and quality of services because that’s where the biggest costs are,” says Adams.

But the bad economy has forced many cities to cut services to the bone, says Luis Salazar, a bankruptcy lawyer in Coral Gables, Fla., who served as a city councilman in Leonia, N.J., when that town faced a budget crisis in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

“A lot of these cities have already made severe cuts, so it’s not clear how much worse services can get,” Salazar says. “You still need cops, and you still need to put out fires.”

But there is a silver lining in bankruptcy, according to Salazar. The city gets breathing room from creditors.

“Breathing room may not save services that are on the chopping block, but it makes it possible for the city to reset and eventually get back to a point where it can offer services at a lower cost,” Salazar says.



What happens to taxes?

While increased revenue would be a boon to any city facing bankruptcy, it’s unclear whether taxes would go up immediately. For one thing, “You’re asking people to pay more at a time when they are getting fewer services,” Salazar says.

Even if a city can muster the political will to raise taxes, doing so may not help revenues, says Dennis Hoffman, an economics professor at Arizona State University in Tempe, Ariz.

“Increased taxes may come later on, but there’s often a stigma associated with municipal bankruptcies, and that can mean an erosion of the tax base if people leave,” Hoffman says.

Adams says the buck stops with the bankrupt municipality. County and state taxpayers aren’t on the hook for a bankrupt municipality’s debts. But in dire cases, it’s possible for a city to dissolve.

“When that happens, the burden of providing services falls to the county, and in some areas, the state may have to pick up the slack,” Adams says. “So, it’s possible that those costs may be passed on indirectly to taxpayers elsewhere.”

Borrowing money again

One big long-term consideration that can impact both services and taxes is how the municipal bond market treats a city that has filed for bankruptcy.

“Municipal bond issuers have a long memory,” Hoffman says. “So it’s possible that a bankrupt city will pay more to borrow or won’t be able to borrow at all.”

Salazar says that paying more to borrow or not being able to borrow at all can be a huge long-term blow to a city.

“Cities need to borrow to pay for infrastructure projects,” he says. “But they also need to borrow to finance their day-to-day budgets because bonds are how many cities manage cash flow. Remember, tax revenues don’t always come in when it’s time to pay police and fire.”

Increased borrowing costs may just be a fact of life for some cities in the years to come. But what really worries Hoffman is how the municipal bond market responds to cities that didn’t file.

“Municipal bonds used to be considered a fairly conservative, safe place to park money,” Hoffman says. “While that’s still largely true, it’s also possible that bond issuers will demand higher interest rates because a wave of big municipal bankruptcies may increase the perceived risk of lending to cities.”

Promoted Stories