New Visitors Privacy Policy Sponsorship Contact Us Media
Baby Boomers Family Green Home and Auto In Critical Condition Just Starting Out Lifestyle Money
-advertisement -
News & Advice Compare Rates Calculators
Rate Alerts  |  Glossary  |  Help
Mortgage Home
Auto CDs &
Retirement Checking &
Taxes Personal

2006: A look back - A look ahead  
  The landscape was schizophrenic in 2006 but a slow economy could fuel a rates war in 2007.
 Checking & savings
 Personal finance calendar  Personal finance calendar 

Savings at record lows ... and record highs

Is it a bad thing?
The status of the American consumer's balance sheet isn't all doom and gloom, Leggett says. He points to Federal Reserve statistics to show that even as Americans are spending more and borrowing more, their net worth continues to go up.

Leggett points out that, driven by asset appreciation that is outpacing their spending, the net worth of American households at the end of the first quarter of 2006 was $53.8 trillion. By comparison, in 2002, the household net worth was $39.1 trillion.

Unfortunately, stagnating home values, a dip in stock prices or some unforeseen calamity could cause the whole equation to shift radically out of balance.

This may be part of the motivation behind the Federal Reserve's latest policy of driving up the federal funds rate.

"You would clearly see that higher interest rates would cause people to consume less," Leggett says. "It would slow down consumption by causing borrowing to be more expensive."

Higher interest rates also reward consumers who save a bit at the end of each month by yielding more returns on those deposits.

Foreign markets could also force the American consumer to buy less through worsening exchange rates. As foreign investors see Americans sinking further into debt, they may begin to have doubts about the long-term strength of the economy. That could cause them to lose their taste for U.S. investments and stop pouring money into our markets. Any interruption in that cash flow would drive down the value of the dollar, which would make imports more expensive.

"Organizations such as the Federal Reserve try to make the landing soft by heading off trends, such as inflation and overspending, before they force a market correction," Leggett says.

But Leggett and other economists, such as Milt Marquis, senior economist for the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, who wrote an issue paper on the savings rate, believe that even without a rise in interest rates, the nation's consumption would balance out as other aspects of the economy shifted.

"A slowdown in economic activity could potentially cause a decline in asset values," Leggett says. "If you are insecure about the economy you are going to save more."

Balancing act
Laufenberg says he is dubious as to whether concern about the negative savings rate is even warranted.

"I get a kick out of the claim that this is the first time since the Great Depression that the personal saving rate has been negative," he says. "As currently measured, that is correct, but the personal saving rate was estimated to have been negative before only to be revised upward as more complete data became available. Hence, it is reasonable to expect that the current negative saving rate will be revised upward eventually as well."

Leggett predicts that beginning in 2007 the statistics will shift and spending will fall.

"During the '80s and '90s, Baby Boomers were in their peak household formation period. That represents their peak consumption," Legett says. "As they age they will shift back to a saver mode."

And even as they fret about the declining savings rate, economists actually worry about consumers saving too much. That's because every dollar consumers choose not to spend takes money out of the economy, reducing corporate profits. If consumers were to stop spending in mass, the economy could grind into a painful slowdown.

Esoteric economic arguments aside, most financial planners agree that when it comes to savings, every family should have a sufficient emergency fund set aside to protect them from financial disaster.

In most cases, families should have at least three to six months of expenses set aside just in case, not to mention enough to finance an extended retirement.

Michael Giusti is a freelance writer based in New Orleans.

-- Posted: Nov. 1, 2006
<< Previous article | Next article >>
Page | 1 | 2 | 3 |

- advertisement -
- advertisement -

About Bankrate | Privacy Policy/Your California Privacy Rights | Online Media Kit | Partnerships | Investor Relations | Press Room | Contact Us | Sitemap
NYSE: RATE | RSS Feeds |

* Mortgage rate may include points. See rate tables for details. Click here.
* To see the definition of overnight averages click here. ®, Copyright © 2016 Bankrate, Inc., All Rights Reserved, Terms of Use.