New Visitors Privacy Policy Sponsorship Contact Us Media
Baby Boomers Family Green Home and Auto In Critical Condition Just Starting Out Lifestyle Money
- advertisement -
Bankrate.com
News & Advice Compare Rates Calculators
Rate Alerts  |  Glossary  |  Help
Mortgage Home
Equity
Auto CDs &
Investments
Retirement Checking &
Savings
Credit
Cards
Debt
Management
College
Finance
Taxes Personal
Finance

Girls just wanna have financial security

When Michelle Wie competed in the quarterfinals of the men's U.S. Amateur Public Links Championship earlier this month, she captured the attention of golf enthusiasts everywhere, but not necessarily their support. Some men groused that she shouldn't compete against their brethren on the grounds that she doesn't have the muscle mass to be on a level playing field. Even commentator Frank Deford made this point recently on National Public Radio.

- advertisement -

Heck, she can drive a ball 300 yards and play under par. It's not really her muscle mass they're concerned about. It's their fragile male egos, which can't endure the sight of grown men getting whipped by a 15-year-old girl.

Women, on the other hand, have one message for Michelle Wie: You go, girl!

The income disparity
When competing against men in the investing arena, women have a significant handicap. They make less money. While overall the wage gap has narrowed, it's still significant: For every dollar earned by a man, a woman makes about 80 cents, according to the most recent numbers available from the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics. The disparity is greater for women in the 45- to 54-year-old age group, with an earnings ratio of 73 percent, or 73 cents on the dollar.

So when gender-comparison studies come out with findings that women have less confidence about their retirement savings than do men, I can't help but roll my eyes. How can they be confident when they're not on a level playing field?

For instance, more men than women say they have saved or are currently saving for retirement, according to the 2005 Retirement Confidence Survey, recently released by the Employee Benefit Research Institute and Mathew Greenwald & Associates.

"However, this difference appears to be largely driven by differences in household income between men and women," according to the study. "When income is held constant, men and women appear equally likely to say they are saving for retirement."

See what I mean? That survey provides other interesting statistics, but it is based on 20-minute phone interviews with about 1,250 Americans and focuses more on investor attitudes than on actual hard data about their portfolios.

Men's portfolios bigger than women's
The Transamerica Small Business Retirement Survey is based on information from 601 U.S. businesses and some 1,200 full-time employees. This study reveals that women aren't as prepared as men are for retirement, with numbers to back that up. Even though both men and women start saving at roughly the same median age (27), and even though three-fourths of both sexes participate in a company retirement plan, women lag men in important ways. According to the study's findings:

  • Women contribute a median of 6 percent of their paycheck to their retirement plans vs. 7 percent for men.
  • Women spend five hours a year managing their retirement accounts, half as much time as men.
  • Women have accumulated significantly less retirement savings ($71,800 vs. $122,700 men). Women also profess to know less than they should about investing (80 percent vs. 67 percent men).
  • Even though they tend to live longer, women underestimate their retirement needs vis-a-vis men -- $639,000 vs. $941,000 for men.

Some quick-and-dirty calculations validate the first and third points. If a woman earns $36,500 on average and tucks away 6 percent (or $2,190) of her annual pay into a retirement fund earning 7 percent a year, she will have saved $74,458 after 18 years -- not far from the $71,800 figure. Meanwhile, if a man earns $50,000 and puts aside 7 percent ($3,500), using the same assumptions, he ends up with $118,997 -- close to the $122,700 figure. These calculations don't take into account pay raises and other occurrences that may change contribution levels, but they serve to show that this study accurately reflects the retirement realities women face.

 
 
-- Posted: July 27, 2005
     

 

 
 

 

Looking for more stories like this? We'll send them directly to you!
Bankrate.com's corrections policy
Print   E-mail

Checking and Savings
Compare today's rates
NATIONAL OVERNIGHT AVERAGES
Interest checking 0.39%
MMA 0.36%
$10K MMA 0.33%



RELATED CALCULATORS
  How long will your savings last  
  How to reach a savings goal -- with scheduled payments  
  Watch your savings grow with regular deposits  
VIEW ALL 
BASICS SERIES
Checking Basics
Manage your account in a fee-friendly way.
What's the best checking
account for me?
ABCs of ATMs
What are all these fees?
Is online banking secure?

MORE ON BANKRATE
Banking glossary  
News archive  
Keep an eye on the leading rates  
Find a high-yielding CD


- advertisement -
 
- advertisement -

About Bankrate | Privacy Policy/Your California Privacy Rights | Online Media Kit | Partnerships | Investor Relations | Press Room | Contact Us | Sitemap
NYSE: RATE | RSS Feeds |

* Mortgage rate may include points. See rate tables for details. Click here.
* To see the definition of overnight averages click here.

Bankrate.com ®, Copyright © 2014 Bankrate, Inc., All Rights Reserved, Terms of Use.