|
Mortgage rates slipped back this week.
The benchmark 30-year fixed-rate mortgage dropped 16 basis points, to 5.96 percent, according to the Bankrate.com national survey of large lenders. A basis point is one-hundredth of 1 percentage point.
The mortgages in this week's survey had an average total of 0.31 discount and origination points. One year ago, the mortgage index was 6.31 percent; four weeks ago, it was 6.39 percent.
The benchmark 15-year fixed-rate mortgage fell 14 basis points, to 5.56 percent. The benchmark 5/1 adjustable-rate mortgage slipped 9 basis points to 5.95 percent. The 5/1 ARM has now fallen 49 basis points in three weeks.
 |
| Weekly
national mortgage survey |
 |
| This week's rate: |
5.96% |
5.56%
|
5.95%
|
| Change from last week: |
-0.16 |
-0.14
|
-0.09
|
| Monthly payment: |
$958.02 |
$1,353.45
|
$983.96
|
| Change from last week: |
-$17.00 |
-$12.31
|
-$9.55
|
In recent months, mortgage rates have seesawed.
However, one thing has remained consistent during that time: New-home
sales have gone nowhere. Even when sharply plunging mortgage rates
spurred a wave of refinancing in January, potential buyers continued
to keep their options open and wallets closed.
Tax credits to the rescue?
Now, congressional policymakers appear to have stumbled upon a
new solution du jour to the housing crisis: tax credits.
Both the U.S. House and Senate have made tax credits a centerpiece
of legislative attempts to right the listing ship that is the housing market. Ideas
currently being floated include:
 |
| Ideas for housing crisis legislation |
 |
|
|
|
These new tax credits are intended to reduce the number of foreclosures
from the market, stabilize home prices and boost overall sales.
But critics say such congressional efforts may be misguided.
David Abromowitz, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress,
says the proposed tax credits are unlikely to turn housing around
because they don't specifically target neighborhoods that need the
help most.
"The tax-credit proposal is pretty diffused," says Abromowitz,
who closely studies housing policy. "It doesn't limit the (tax)
credit to buying homes in neighborhoods where there's a cluster
of foreclosures."
While the proposed tax credits may help spur some home sales, the
criteria for earning these credits are not precise enough to encourage
shoppers to look in neighborhoods "that had been stable, middle-class
communities but are in danger of dropping back into troubled communities,"
he says.
Instead, Abromowitz champions policies that reward the purchase
of homes in neighborhoods that meet very specific criteria: high
rates of foreclosures, large number of defaults and significant
loss of property value.
"If you follow those measures, you're going to be pretty on-target
where the greatest need is," he says.
He praises pending "block grant" legislation in the Senate and the House as more likely to positively impact housing.
Last month, Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chair of the House Financial
Services Committee, introduced a housing rescue package that includes
$10 billion in loans and grants for communities to purchase and
rehabilitate foreclosed homes. A similar Senate proposal allocates
$4 billion in grants for local governments to buy foreclosed properties.
"Targeting block grant funds to responsible local groups to
buy up vacant foreclosed houses and get them back as homeownership
for low and moderate income buyers is the fastest, most direct route
to turn the tide on a problem that's devastating many communities,"
Abromowitz says.
Unintended consequences
Eric Toder, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute and co-director
of the Tax Policy Center, also questions the wisdom of the proposed
tax credits. "I don't feel that using tax credits to artificially
move prices around in short times is terribly good policy,"
he says.
Housing already enjoys significant tax advantages compared with
other investments, Toder says. Such tax breaks have created "a
huge incentive" for Americans to buy bigger and more expensive
houses, which has contributed to a speculative bubble that is partially
responsible for today's real estate mess, he says.
Proposed tax credits may boost housing prices temporarily, but
they simply delay the inevitable solution to the housing crisis,
Toder says.
"I think in the long run what really needs to happen is that
prices need to come down to some long-term sustainable level,"
Toder says. "That's a painful adjustment."
Tax credits can also have unintended consequences, Toder says.
For example, the Senate's proposal to create a tax credit for people
who purchase homes in foreclosure may end up hurting home sellers
whose homes are not in foreclosure.
"If you give a tax credit to the foreclosed properties, the
nonforeclosed properties become even worse off in competition to
that," he says.
Instead of tax credits, Toder would like to see Congress patch
up holes in the current regulatory structure, "so that investors
have more confidence that they really know what they're getting
into and people are not being encouraged to take out loans that
in the long run they can't service."
He also prefers to see policymakers concentrate on solutions that
help people at risk of foreclosure to stay in their homes.
"A tax credit for houses that are foreclosed doesn't do a
whole lot for people who are trying to hold on to their houses,"
he says.
Apparently, the White House agrees. President Bush already has
threatened to veto the Senate legislation, with administration press
secretary Dana Perino saying the bill "will likely do more
harm than good."
|