|
Changes coming to FHA loans
By Michael
D. Larson Bankrate.com
The
government's continuing effort to improve its loan products took
another step forward recently when federal legislators approved
a bill that will broaden the Federal
Housing Administration mortgage program, cut costs on refinancing
reverse mortgages and make more money available for home improvements.
Passed by the House of Representatives on April
6, the American
Homeownership and Economic Opportunity Act now awaits Senate
action. H.R. 1776 or a similar compromise bill will likely make
it through the gauntlet, observers say, if supporters can beat this
fall's election season malaise.
"This bill is the last piece of the housing
reform puzzle in America," said Congressman Rick Lazio, R-N.Y.,
after representatives voted for it 417-8. "This bill works to make
the dream of homeownership more accessible by removing regulatory
obstacles that stand in the way of the individual's ability to purchase
a home."
What
the changes are
Thanks to the proposed changes, FHA loans should be even more
attractive for the borrowers who typically use them. They include
first-time home buyers and people with less-than-perfect credit
attracted to the loans' low down payment requirements and liberal
underwriting standards.
But the benefits of the act don't stop there.
Seniors won't have to spend as much money to refinance certain reverse
mortgages if it becomes law. Plus, current owners looking to improve
their properties will be able to borrow more money under the Department
of Housing and Urban Development's Title
One program.
From a broader perspective, it's just the latest
example of a reform process that's been under way for years. Take
FHA, for example. HUD has been eager to respond to an administration
focused on boosting homeownership. As part of that effort, they
have modified the application process so borrowers experience faster
turnaround times and less red tape.
|
What do you think about H.R. 1776?
|
|
Tell your senator or representative using these
links:
|
But other interested parties have done their
share as well. Legislators in 1998 hiked FHA loan limits by up to
26 percent, allowing consumers who need larger mortgages to use
the government program. Meanwhile, the agencies behind the two dominant
automated underwriting systems have upgraded them so they can process
FHA loans electronically. That has accelerated the closing process.
Finally, HUD recently announced plans to introduce its own automated
underwriting engine later this year. The system will operate "transparently,"
meaning consumers will know exactly what it considers when deciding
whether to approve or deny a loan application.
"It's consistent with the efforts to increase
homeownership and also make the FHA program attractive to first-time
home buyers," says Bud Carter, senior director of residential finance
at the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America in Washington. "That's the predominant
group FHA serves, that and low- to moderate-income families."
More
loan options available
So what changes are in store? For starters, consumers will
have a wider choice of FHA loans than they do today. Borrowers will
be able to get so-called hybrid ARMs -- adjustable rate mortgages
that have initial fixed-rate periods of three, five or seven years
before adjusting annually thereafter -- in addition to the 15-year
fixed rate, 30-year fixed rate and 1-year adjustable rate mortgages
now offered.
"That product has been quite popular in the
conventional market -- 3/1 ARMs, 5/1 ARMs, 7/1 ARMs," says Al Jackson,
vice president of compliance and government issues for Principal
Financial Group's mortgage
division. "It's a matter of keeping up with the times for FHA
and HUD. This is the kind of product consumers want and HUD needs
to be in the business of providing consumers with what they want."
A temporary fix that effectively lowered the
FHA down payment requirement will be made permanent with the legislation,
too. The government used to calculate how much a person needed to
pay at closing using a complex tiered formula, which usually resulted
in the borrower fronting more cash. HUD adopted a simplified procedure
a few years ago, but its ability to continue using it will expire
soon without H.R. 1776.
"Congress only authorized that on a pilot basis
and that pilot expires at the end of September," Carter says.
Civil
servants gain, too
Civil servants stand to gain from the new bill as well. Under
one of its sections, teachers, police officers, firefighters and
others will be permitted to get FHA mortgages for just 1 percent
down instead of the typical 3 percent. They'll also be able to defer
the 2.25 percent fee the government usually collects at closing
to bolster the insurance fund that makes FHA lending possible.
Seniors with a HUD-backed Home
Equity Conversion Mortgage won't have to pay as much to refinance
it into a new government-backed reverse mortgage either. Instead
of having to pay another full insurance premium when moving from
one HECM to another, they'll only have to pay a nominal amount.
For borrowers using a HECM to cover long-term care insurance or
health-care costs, HUD won't collect the usual upfront premium at
all.
People who want to replace windows, add a garage
or perform other non-luxury home improvements will find they can
get more money, too. Title One loans from HUD currently allow consumers
with little or no equity to borrow up to $25,000 for upgrades. They
get the money either directly from government-approved lenders or
through contractors who partner with one. H.R. 1776 boosts the loan
cap to $32,500.
"You're not looking for the borrower to have
any equity in the property and that makes it available to a lot
of homeowners, especially new homeowners," says Peter Bell, executive
director of the Home
Improvement Lenders Association in Washington.
"If you have people who have bought homes in
the last year or two or three with 90 to 95 percent loan-to-value
mortgages, which is increasingly the case, they have no equity accumulated
so they could not get a home equity loan."
All told, the changes will make borrowing cheaper
and easier for a wide variety of consumers -- if they're implemented.
Proponents feel there shouldn't be much of a problem getting at
least part of H.R. 1776 passed, considering the bipartisan vote
of confidence the bill received from House legislators a few weeks
ago. And Jackson, for one, is optimistic.
"I think the prospects are good and I'm hoping
that it will move through with all due haste because it makes a
lot of sense," he says. "A lot of changes have taken place in the
industry over the years and FHA has to change with the times."
|