| 'Bounced-check protection' rules
draw critics |
|
|
|
"This is an extension of credit," says Fox.
"If you pay $20 to get $100, that's no different than going
to a payday lender and paying $120 to walk out with $100, and then
you pay it back with your next paycheck."
Nessa Feddis, senior federal counsel at American Bankers
Association, says the new rules clear up previous questions regarding
fee disclosure.
"Earlier on, when the programs were new, there
was some confusion, but a lot of the disclosures have improved significantly,
and the Fed and the agencies have addressed the relevant issues.
"Consumer groups think that no one should ever
pay an overdraft. But if you prohibit that, there will be riots
in the streets. If you don't pay a customer's mortgage, they'll
be furious. That's not consumer friendly; it's not what consumers
want. Consumers want the bank to pay (overdrafts). We don't think
people should write checks when they don't have the funds, but people
make mistakes and you need some compassion here," says Feddis.
The new rules require institutions that promote the
payment of overdrafts in an advertisement to disclose the total
amount of fees or charges in the customer's periodic statement.
Consumer groups argue that that's after the fact. Banks must also
inform customers of fees for the service when they open an account.
The Fed also expressed concerns about misleading advertisements
and outlines several examples of prohibited ads.
 |
Examples of prohibited ads: |
 |
|
|
|
The Fed has left the door open to eventually
putting bounced-check protection plans under Truth in Lending regulations
if necessary. Consumer groups vow to continue monitoring the market
and say they will pursue congressional legislation.
|