|
Wage and hour inspections
could be costly, too
By Jennie
L. Phipps Bankrate.com
Less scary, but potentially more expensive than an
OSHA visit, is a letter from the wage and hour division of the Department
of Labor (state or federal) seeking your records as part of an investigation
into alleged employee pay violations.
"Wage and hour are the most frequently violated
federal laws. Violations are everywhere," says David L. Swider,
partner with Bose, McKinney & Evans employment law firm in Indianapolis,
Ind. Swider believes there are so many violations because the laws
are confusing and there's a large discretionary component in their
enforcement.
If you find your company didn't follow the laws, the
price can escalate quickly. The department has the right to go back
four years, even locating employees who no longer work for you.
And penalties could be added to whatever it might cost you to make
past pay wrongs right.
Here is Swider's advice for making the least of a
wage and hour investigation.
Know the rules.
Wage and hour laws are deceptively simple, but they trip up a lot
of business owners. Put a good reference book on your shelf, and
read it regularly. Swider recommends those sold by CCH
Inc. The company tracks, reports, explains and analyzes employment
and tax law.
Follow the rules.
Just because the company down the street didn't get caught doesn't
mean you won't. Most investigations are triggered by complaints.
All it takes is one disgruntled employee or ex-employee to pick
up the phone.
Tread lightly.
The U.S. Department of Labor has been promoting its compliance
assistance. The agency will send a representative to your workplace
or business group meeting to provide seminars and answer questions.
Swider is skeptical about inviting one of these representatives
into your building. "It could put you on the radar screen,"
he says. "My experience with federal and state agencies is
that they tend to be one-sided."
Instead, he recommends hiring a consultant who can
offer a more balanced business approach. "It may cost you some
money, but it could save you in the end."
Play it straight.
The most common wage violation involves incorrectly putting people
on the exempt payroll, which makes them ineligible for overtime.
Look over your records and straighten out any problems because if
the practice is questioned, says Swider, "the employer is going
to lose."
The second most-common violation is failing to pay
a worker for preparation, clean-up or travel time. Even if it galls
you to do it, pay the overtime. "The onus is on the employer
to prove that the employee wasn't working more than 40 hours,"
Swider says. "It's your word against the employee's, and you
can watch the money add up quickly."
Be responsive.
The easier you make it for the Department of Labor to inspect your
records, the faster this will be over. Sending a response that says,
"We didn't do it" without supporting evidence will just
bring trouble. Prepare the documents, and send them with a well-thought-out
response.
Get those I-9s in shape.
Labor departments are under a lot of pressure to enforce immigration
law. That means if a wage and hour inspector finds any violation,
he probably will add an immigration inspection to his list. So make
sure you have appropriate paperwork -- Form I-9, Employment Eligibility
Verification -- on file for each employee.
Remember, they're overworked,
too.
In many parts of the country, the Department of Labor will settle
happily for a thorough self-analysis. If you recognize that you're
at fault, tell wage and hour "mea culpa." Notify every
employee and ex-employee who's affected, and rectify the problem
by paying back wages. Then spell out the solution for the department.
With any luck, the agency will be satisfied by this full and complete
action and go away.
Don't roll over if you're not
guilty.
The rules are not absolute, even though wage and hour likes to make
them sound that way. If you can explain the underlying rationale,
the department will frequently defer action. This will probably
require hiring a lawyer who knows the ropes, but in the long term,
it could save you bigger bucks.
Jennie L. Phipps is a contributing
editor based in Michigan.
-- Posted: Jan. 25, 2002
|