|
Don't be deceived by low ARM rates
By Greg
McBride Bankrate.com
Adjustable
mortgage rates have consistently dropped through much of the year, unlike
the alternating up and down movements of fixed-rate mortgages. The
last time adjustable mortgage rates were appreciably lower than
the current level was 1993-1994.
But do not be deceived by these low rates. Fixed-rate
mortgages are not far removed from the record lows established in
November, and remain well below the 7 percent mark. In such a low
rate environment, especially an environment that has prevailed for
nearly 18 months, adjustable-rate mortgages are not a mass appeal
product.
Adjustable-rate mortgages, or ARMs, are a niche product
that appeal to consumers in certain situations. When rates are high,
this net is cast a little wider and encompasses a broader group.
But with fixed rates so low, what situations would warrant passing
up an ultra-low fixed rate for the even-lower, yet uncertain, adjustable
rate?
Perhaps the most prevalent are borrowers moving into
starter homes they plan to occupy for only a few years before upgrading.
Such borrowers can obtain hybrid ARMs, which are fixed for an initial
period of years before becoming adjustable. Examples include a 3/1,
5/1, 7/1 or 10/1 ARM. The shorter the initial period, the lower
the initial rate.
The details are crucial. The initial fixed period
must exceed the borrower's intended time horizon in the home. If
so, the loan essentially functions as a fixed-rate loan, at a rate
lower than traditional fixed rate loans, during the time the borrower
occupies the home. If this initial period expires before the borrower
has moved on, the rate becomes adjustable. However, it still may
take a couple years before the benefit of the initial lower rate
is offset.
A similar circumstance is a borrower who is subject
to frequent job transfers, but who wants to build equity rather
than just rent. The aforementioned hybrid ARMs make a fine option
in this case as well.
People who can reasonably expect substantial pay increases
in coming years also may be comfortable taking an ARM initially,
just to get into a home they otherwise could not afford on a fixed-rate
loan. The idea is that future income will rise faster than either
the adjustable rate or the cost of refinancing into a fixed rate
loan. Of course, defining oneself as one who can reasonably expect
a sharp increase in income is highly subjective. Needless to say,
this doesn't refer to the lottery hopefuls, but rather young professionals
in high-paying fields, such as doctors with growing practices or
lawyers with good prospects of making partner at their firms.
Some borrowers opt for interest-only mortgages to
maximize their tax deduction while minimizing their debt service.
The pitfalls here are that the borrower builds no equity other than
what is attributable to property appreciation; rates are often adjustable
either during or after the interest-only term; and balloon payments
are often needed.
If looking to avoid the balloon payment, borrowers
are forced to refinance before the interest-only period expires.
This can put them in an amortizing mortgage with terms less favorable
than what would have originally been found when the home was initially
purchased.
Further, not building any equity by chipping away
at the loan principal can be a dangerous proposition in lieu of
a significant down payment and if property values nosedive. Such
a scenario could leave a borrower owing more than the home is worth,
even after several years of making monthly payments.
Fixed mortgage rates will inevitably begin to climb.
When they do, lenders will begin placing greater emphasis on adjustable-rate
mortgages. But fixed mortgage rates have a long way to rise before
borrowers should begin looking at other loan options.
At this stage, if a borrower doesn't fall into one
of these niches, and still can't afford the monthly payment on a
fixed rate loan, they're looking at the wrong house, not the wrong
loan.
Greg McBride is a financial analyst
for Bankrate.com.
For advice regarding your specific
situation, please e-mail one of Bankrate.com's
Q&A experts or visit the Advice
channel on Bankrate.com.
-- Posted:
May 31, 2002
|