 |
Ask Dr. Don
By
Don
Taylor,
Ph.D.,
CFA
Bankrate.com |
Taking on rate risk can shorten
mortgage length
Dear Dr. Don,
We are buying what we hope will be our last house.
The mortgage is for $80,000, while the house is worth $185,000. My
question is, what would be in your opinion the best bet? My choices
are a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage at 5.5 percent, a 30-year variable-rate
mortgage currently at 5 percent, or an interest-only LIBOR mortgage
at 3 percent but the interest rate can change every six months. I
would pay about $1,200/month with $1,000 going to principal because
I would try to pay the house off in about five to six years.
Thanks,
Steve Shorten
Dear Steve,
Being willing to take on some interest rate risk can shorten the
life of your loan and potentially reduce the amount of interest
paid over the life of the loan. The table below uses the information
provided in your letter with the simplifying assumption that the
interest rate on the variable rate loans stayed constant over the
life of the loan.
|
Which mortgage will be paid off first?
|
| |
Type of loan
|
| |
30-year fixed |
30-year variable* |
Interest-only variable* |
| Loan amount: |
$80,000 |
$80,000 |
$80,000 |
| Interest rate: |
5.5% |
5% |
3% |
| Loan term (months): |
360 |
360 |
n/a |
| Loan payment: |
$454.23 |
$429.46 |
Varies |
| Additional principal |
$745.77 |
$770.54 |
Varies |
| Total monthly payment: |
$1,200 |
$1,200 |
$1,200 |
| Payoff in months |
80 |
79 |
74 |
| Total payments: |
$95,689.23 |
$93,917.50 |
$87,623.72 |
| Total interest expense: |
$15,689.32 |
$13,917.29 |
$ 7,632.72 |
| *Assumes that the interest rate
on the variable rate debt doesn't change over the life of the
loan. |
The Federal Reserve establishes the targeted rate
for Fed Funds and that rate influences other short-term interest
rates. LIBOR is the British equivalent of the Fed Funds rate.
The Fed is trying to stay on the sidelines for now
to encourage economic growth by taking away the threat of rising
short-term interest rates. That gives variable-rate mortgages a
short-term advantage over fixed-rate mortgages. LIBOR doesn't have
to move in tandem with the Fed Funds rate but the two rates are
highly correlated.
Your aggressive approach to making additional principal
payments makes the interest-only mortgage a viable option. While
you are taking on the interest rate risk, the large additional principal
payments diminish the amount of money at risk as time passes. I
did run a what-if scenario that had the interest rate on your interest-only
mortgage go up by 1 percent each year and the loan was still paid
off in 78 months with a total interest expense of $12,625.85.
Regardless of the mortgage you choose, make sure the
lender allows additional principal payments without a prepayment
penalty. A prepayment penalty in the early years of the mortgage
takes away the current short-term advantage of using variable-rate
financing.
If you know the loan's pricing spread to LIBOR and
which LIBOR rate is being used you can use Bankrate's Rate
Watch page to monitor changes in the mortgage interest rate.
In the end you need to ask yourself, "How much
risk am I willing to take on to save a few thousand dollars over
the interest expense on the fixed-rate loan?" To me, the ARM
at a current interest rate of 5 percent with a 30-year amortization
doesn't offer enough of an incentive to take on the interest rate
risk, but the interest-only LIBOR-based ARM does. With that loan
you have the potential to cut your interest expense in half on either
a pretax or after-tax basis.
-- Posted: Oct. 14, 2003
|