Bankate.com
 
News and AdviceCompare RatesCalculators
Glossary  |  Help  
 
 
- advertisement -
 
 

Assessing Wall Street scandals

Page | 1 | 2 | 3 |

"Nasdaq is a computer network," Weiss points out. "No specialists, no floor brokers, no trading floor. Most stock markets nowadays, from Tokyo to London, are like that -- all electronic."

- advertisement -

But the NYSE maintains that the specialist system is superior to computer networks. For one thing, the frenzy of market activity can't be captured by focusing cameras on a computer network.

Says Weiss, "The NYSE and its defenders say that having people throwing papers around on a trading floor contributes measurably to the smooth flow of the markets generally, thereby justifying the existence of the specialist system and the existence of the exchange and the existence of the big building at Wall and Broad with the columns in front, and all salaries and benefits and pensions paid therein."

Weiss's book is laced with sardonic humor, provoking chortles, guffaws and at times some rather uneasy laughter.

So how did the aforementioned specialists get into trouble? Apparently some were found to have made trades that were "improperly positioned between buyers and sellers," putting their customers at a disadvantage. At the turn of the 21st century, over a period of several years, they made trades ahead of customers thousands of times, resulting in hundreds of thousands of dollars (and sometimes millions of dollars) in improper profits for their specialist firms. But get this: These illicit trades accounted for less than 1 percent of the volume of trades executed by each specialist.

Does that minimize the sin at all, from your point of view?

From the perspective of federal prosecutors, such gains are your losses. The specialist firms involved already settled the civil cases related to the trading scandal, having paid out $248 million in 2004 without admitting or denying wrongdoing. This, by the way, is the standard way that Wall Street firms handle their misdeeds. When they are called on by a government regulatory agency to right a wrong, they generally pay fines, but do not admit or deny any wrongdoing. It seems like a way to do penance while avoiding the uncomfortable moment in the confessional.

Status of specialists
So far, of the 15 indictments made a year and a half ago, charges were dropped for a couple of specialists, two were acquitted at trial and two pleaded guilty in May, receiving prison sentences of 27 months and fines of $250,000 each. In July, two specialists were convicted of securities fraud. Six cases have yet to be tried.

Most recently, in October, one specialist, whose trades were found to be more problematic than the others, was convicted of three counts of securities fraud. The prosecutor said in opening arguments that the trader "improperly positioned himself between public buy and sell orders more than 26,000 times between 1999 and 2003. As a result, the specialist made more than $4.5 million in illegal profits for his firm," according to a report in The Wall Street Journal.

The defendant's lawyer argued that the trades represented less than 1 percent of the trades executed by the specialist and that these "were simply the result of mistakes and miscommunication during a frenzied period of trading at the Big Board."

Let's see, 26,000 trades resulting from mistakes and miscommunication. Wow! That has to be a record. Though this trader potentially faces 20 years in prison, he will likely get a lighter sentence. Why? Because the presiding judge "raised questions about the government's case, saying there 'is some fuzziness in the law,'" according to The Wall Street Journal. Among the judge's observations: These trades appear to be commonplace at the Big Board.

Just because it is common, does that make it OK in your book? And what about other Wall Street scandals? Are the underhanded slights against individual investors something we should just accept as part of the cost of investing in the stock market? Or is there something inherently wrong with companies making profits at the expense of unwitting investors?

 
 
Next: Where do you stand on recent Wall Street scandals?
Page | 1 | 2 | 3 |
 
 RESOURCES
Losing track of 401(k) fees
CEO disclosure rules won't fix the system
Our capitalistic democracy is all skewed up
 TOP PERSONAL FINANCE STORIES
Reverse mortgages not for everyone
6 tips for living with your adult child
Saver wonders: pay tax now or later?
 


Compare Rates
NATIONAL OVERNIGHT AVERAGES
IRA MMA 2.27%
1 yr IRA CD 3.34%
5 yr IRA CD 3.98%
ADVERTISING PARTNERS
Mortgage calculator
See your FICO Score Range -- Free
How much money can you save in your 401(k) plan?
Which is better -- a rebate or special dealer financing?
VIEW MORE CALCULATORS
SAVE YOUR HOME
Struggling to pay your mortgage? Read this.
 
- advertisement -


News & Advice | Compare Rates | Calculators
Mortgage | Home Equity | Auto | Investing | Checking & Savings | Credit Cards | Debt Management | College Finance | Taxes | Personal Finance
About Bankrate | Privacy | Online Media Kit | Partnerships | Investor Relations | Press/Broadcast | Contact Us | Sitemap
NASDAQ: RATE | RSS Feeds | Order Rate Data | Bankrate Canada | Bankrate China

* Mortgage rate may include points. See rate tables for details. Click here.
* To see the definition of overnight averages click here.

Bankrate.com ®, Copyright © 2008 Bankrate, Inc., All Rights Reserved, Terms of Use.